Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Control of Education Policy at Stake as B.C. Appeals Teachers' Court Victories

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Control of Education Policy at Stake as B.C. Appeals Teachers' Court Victories

Article excerpt

Appeal takes B.C. teachers' dispute back to court


VANCOUVER - A pair of court cases that became the rallying point for British Columbia's teachers during the longest provincewide strike in its history goes back on the docket this week, ushering a holdover from the summertime dispute into legal chambers.

The provincial government begins its appeal Tuesday in B.C.'s highest court of a January victory by the B.C. Teachers' Federation, the union representing more than 40,000 public school teachers.

During weeks of demonstrations, news conferences and picket lines, teachers repeatedly trumpeted two B.C. Supreme Court rulings that found the province had violated educators' charter rights.

The court twice ruled it was illegal in 2002 for the province to legislate away hundreds of clauses related to class size and composition from the teachers' collective agreement. Justice Susan Griffin handed down rulings favourable to the union first in 2011 and subsequently last winter.

The province is challenging the latest decision in its bid to claim control of educational policy.

"The issue with the deleted clauses, accordingly, is not simply how much money should be spent on K-12 education but how it is to be spent and who should make such decisions," the government says in documents filed with the B.C. Court of Appeal.

The union, meantime, has held firm to what it views should be its own decision-making powers.

"This appeal is not about government's ability to legislate collective agreement terms that a union views as unfavourable," the union writes in its statement of facts filed in late August.

"This appeal is about fundamental freedoms and teachers' rights protected by ... the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms."

Prof. Charles Ungerleider, an education sociologist at the University of B.C. and a former deputy minister of education, said the appeal court has a task with serious ramifications.

"The court is going to have to wrestle with what counts as educational policy," he said. "That's not a clear cut issue."

A specific example of what's at stake includes whether the union or government should decide the appropriate amount of teacher preparation time within the school day, Ungerleider said. Although that provision has been generally treated as a working condition subject to bargaining, the government could argue prep should be incorporated into the duties of teachers under the School Act.

"Should a government respect a collective agreement that was freely bargained, or can it unilaterally alter such an agreement through legislation by declaring whatever it is they want to change a matter a public policy? …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.