Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Mulcair, Union Leaders Differ on Senate's Right to Defeat Labour Bill

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Mulcair, Union Leaders Differ on Senate's Right to Defeat Labour Bill

Article excerpt

Mulcair, unions at odds over Senate role

--

OTTAWA - Tom Mulcair and some of the NDP's traditional allies in the labour movement are at odds over his contention that appointed senators have no business blocking legislation passed by elected MPs.

The NDP leader maintains the unelected Senate has no moral legitimacy in a democracy to thwart the will of elected representatives -- an argument he's ramped up in the wake of this week's scathing audit of senators' expenses.

At the same time, however, union leaders have been feverishly lobbying senators to defeat bill C-377, a private member's bill approved by the House of Commons and strongly backed by the Prime Minister's Office that would force unions to publicly disclose details of their spending.

The Senate has already rejected the bill, which Mulcair has promised to repeal should he become prime minister, once before. Back in 2013, 16 Conservative senators broke ranks to help pass amendments that effectively gutted the bill, which critics have denounced as unconstitutional, undemocratic and an invasion of privacy.

But before the Commons could consider the Senate amendments, Parliament was prorogued and, in accordance with the rules for reinstatement of bills following prorogation, it wound up back before the Senate in its original form.

It is currently stalled in the midst of third reading debate, awaiting a ruling from the Speaker on a motion by Conservative Sen. Diane Bellemare that the bill is out of order.

With the fate of the bill to be decided in the next couple of weeks, union leaders are torn between their sympathy for the NDP's campaign to abolish the upper chamber and their hope that the Senate will exercise its constitutional power to obstruct, amend or defeat the legislation.

"I'm a New Democrat ... I'd be happy if we didn't have a Senate," Paul Moist, national president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, said in an interview.

Nevertheless, Moist added: "While the Senate exists and if it's constitutionally supposed to be a place of sober second thought, we were absolutely happy with their (rejection of the bill the first time around) and we think they should chuck this one as well. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.