Newspaper article The Canadian Press

15 Years Later, 85 Real Estate Firms Not Compliant with Anti-Money Laundering Rules

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

15 Years Later, 85 Real Estate Firms Not Compliant with Anti-Money Laundering Rules

Article excerpt

Money-laundering data raises red flags

--

TORONTO - At least 85 real estate companies have not implemented a plan showing how they are trying to detect money laundering and other suspicious transactions, nearly 15 years after they were required to do so, according to data obtained by The Canadian Press.

The federal anti-money laundering agency received 337 compliance reports from roughly 1,000 companies in the real estate sector it surveyed -- including brokers, sales representatives and developers -- between Jan. 1, 2013, and Feb. 8, 2016.

The data, which was obtained through an access-to-information request, represents only a small sampling of the real estate industry. There are about 20,000 companies in the real estate sector that are required to report to Fintrac.

An analysis of the data contained in those reports found that roughly a quarter of the 337 respondents admitted they had not yet fully implemented a compliance regime, which has been required by federal anti-money laundering laws since 2001.

Thirty-eight of the companies said they had only partially implemented a compliance regime, while the other 47 said they had not even begun to do so. The names of the companies were not included in the documents.

Fintrac spokesman Darren Gibb says some of the reports weren't sent back because the companies no longer exist, while others simply failed to respond.

Fintrac routinely sends out compliance reports to various sectors to gather information about the companies it regulates, says Gibb.

Those reports can sometimes lead to further enforcement actions such as on-site examinations, he says.

"If we see an assessment report come back and it's clear that the entity is not where they should be, then certainly that's a flag for us that it may be examination-worthy," says Gibb.

"Or conversely, if we don't get an assessment report coming back, that's potentially an even bigger flag."

If violations are discovered during an examination, that could lead to fines of up to $100,000 per violation for individuals and up to $500,000 per violation for companies, depending on severity. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.