Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Goodale Cites 'Absolute Carnage' on Roads in Lowering Breathalyzer Hurdle

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Goodale Cites 'Absolute Carnage' on Roads in Lowering Breathalyzer Hurdle

Article excerpt

Pot bill takes aim at drunk driving, too


OTTAWA - It would be easier for police to make drivers blow into a breathalyzer to detect alcohol as well as test people for drugs under the government's new legal-marijuana legislation.

The Liberals are using the occasion of legalizing pot to remake criminal provisions on drunk driving in response to pressure from parliamentarians, the provinces and public, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale acknowledged in an interview.

"One of the things you need to weigh in terms of the appropriateness of a provision like this is the absolute carnage that's caused on our highways and the very severe loss of life, and injury, by impaired driving of all kinds," Goodale said Thursday.

Proposed mandatory alcohol screening measures would allow police to demand a breath sample from any driver they lawfully stop -- a lower bar than the current threshold of suspicion the person has been drinking.

The roadside test would not by itself lead to a charge, but would prompt further investigation including more elaborate testing at the police station.

The government says the aim is to help police catch more drivers at the wheel with more than the legal limit of alcohol in their bloodstream.

Federal ministers insisted Thursday the tougher provisions would not run afoul of the charter of rights.

Police would also be able to demand a saliva sample from a driver if they reasonably suspect the person has drugs in their body.

Telltale signs could include the scent of marijuana, unusually red eyes or abnormal speech patterns.

Should the test lead police to believe an offence has been committed, they could order an examination by an evaluating officer or the taking of a blood sample.

The higher bar for a saliva test than for a breath sample stems from the fact "the science is different," Goodale said.

"With drugs, the oral test is an early part of the evidentiary chain, whereas in the case of a breathalyzer for alcohol it is more definitive evidence in itself. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.