Newspaper article The Canadian Press

NAFTA's Environmental Arm Demands Canada Explain Oilsands Tailings Leaks

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

NAFTA's Environmental Arm Demands Canada Explain Oilsands Tailings Leaks

Article excerpt

Leaks from oilsands get NAFTA scrutiny


OTTAWA - The environmental arm of NAFTA is demanding Canada explain what it is doing to stop oilsands tailings ponds from leaking into Alberta waterways.

The request comes in a decision by the commission which oversees the North American Agreement on Environmental Co-operation, a parallel agreement to NAFTA signed by Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Canada has until Sept. 28 to officially respond to allegations it is failing to enforce the Fisheries Act by allowing contaminants from the ponds to leak into water without forcing the companies involved to fix the problem.

The complaint was made in June by Canada's Environmental Defence group and the Natural Resources Defense Council based in the United States.

Environmental Defence executive director Tim Gray says studies have suggested as much as 11 million litres of tailings water containing substances like benzene, arsenic and cyanide leaks into the Athabasca River every day.

A spokeswoman for Environment Minister Catherine McKenna said the government will work with the commission to respond to the request and expects this to be resolved soon.

"Our government takes the protection of water very seriously," Marie-Pascale Des Rosiers said in an e-mail.

"We are proud of our world-class, joint oilsands monitoring system we have with the government of Alberta."

NAFTA's environment annex allows non-governmental organizations and citizens of the three countries to submit complaints alleging their government is failing to enforce its environmental laws and regulations.

The commission has 30 days to decide if a complaint warrants a response from the government involved.

The request for a response from Canada means the commission found the complaint was submitted by legitimate organizations which offered science-based evidence for their complaints and that it was intended to promote enforcement of environmental law rather than simply harass industry. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.