Newspaper article The Topeka Capital-Journal

State Board Studies Options to Deter Vaping

Newspaper article The Topeka Capital-Journal

State Board Studies Options to Deter Vaping

Article excerpt

The Kansas State Board of Education welcomed a series of recommendations Tuesday in response to the e-cigarette epidemic among youths that featured four ideas for reforming state law and options for changing local school board policy to block vaping by students, employees and school visitors.

Motivation for taking a new path was drawn from anecdotal evidence that e-cigarette usage mushroomed in the past couple of years and from the spring survey of Kansas ninth-graders through 12th-graders. In the survey of public school students, 48.6% said they had used an electronic vapor product to consume tobacco. That was up from 34.8% in 2017 and reflected a 40% surge in use of the devices.

Kansas’ high-school aged students were much more likely to experiment with vaping than traditional cigarettes. The latest report showed 24.8% tried a cigarette, but 48.6% had vaped. The portion who consumed tobacco within 30 days of the survey ranged from 5.8% by cigarette to 22% by vaping.

Kansas Health Institute policy analyst Hina Shah said the state board of education could give thought to endorsing any of four areas of potential statutory change on tobacco consumption ahead of the 2020 session of the Kansas Legislature starting in January.

“What this review does, it gives you kind of an overview of each of the different types of state statutes,” she said.

The first suggestion was for the board to get behind an existing campaign to raise the statewide minimum legal age to purchase tobacco products from 18 to 21. Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have taken this approach to reducing access by adolescents to all forms of tobacco. In Kansas, 29 local units of government have adopted “Tobacco 21” ordinances.

Ann Mah, a Topeka representative on the state board of education, said the Legislature adopted an indoor smoking ban in 2010 in large measure because of evidence secondhand tobacco smoke caused lethal medical problems and increased the state’s health care costs. To inform the 2020 Legislature of the public policy challenge, she said, it would be helpful to have comparable evidence. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.