Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

By Lloyd Dixon; Brian Gill | Go to book overview

3
DATA AND METHODS

This section details the data used in our analysis and our analytic approach. We start by describing how we selected federal district court opinions addressing challenges to expert evidence and how we extracted the salient information from them. We then provide an overview of the opinions in our sample and conclude by describing the methods used to analyze them.


3.1 SELECTION OF OPINIONS AND DATA EXTRACTION

Westlaw Database of Federal District Court Opinions

We drew our sample of opinions from Westlaw's database of federal district court opinions. Figure 3.1 puts the Westlaw database into a broad perspective. Excluding prisoners' petitions, social security cases, and cases in which the federal government is attempting to recover debts,1 roughly 160,000 civil cases are filed in federal court each year. The proportion of cases that involve expert evidence is unknown, as is the proportion of expert evidence that is challenged. Roughly 150 opinions addressing challenges to expert evidence in civil cases appear in Westlaw's database of federal district court opinions each year.

Westlaw provides a readily accessible source of district court opinions that can be searched in electronic form, but its limitations should be understood. First, Westlaw contains only written opinions, as opposed to oral rulings on challenges to expert evidence from the beach. The proportion of opinions on challenges to expert evidence that are written versus oral is unknown. It seems likely, however, that exclusion of expert evidence is more likely to lead to an appealable issue and that judges thus may issue written opinions more frequently when they exclude challenged evidence than when they admit it The frequency with which evidence is excluded will likely be higher in the Westlaw database than for all opinions. This is not a problem for our analysis as long as there is no systematic change over time in the relative propensities of judges to issue written opinions when evidence is excluded versus when it is admitted. We return to this issue in Subsection 4.1.

Second, some written district court opinions are not reported to Westlaw. While Westlaw contains all officially published opinions (such as those appearing in the Federal Supplement) and a substantial number of “unreported” opinions submitted by judges, an unknown number of written opinions never appear in Westlaw. The proportion of opinions reported versus unreported

____________________
1
These types of administrative cases seldom involve expert evidence.

-15-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 90

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.