Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

By Lloyd Dixon; Brian Gill | Go to book overview

REFERENCE

Agresti, A., Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990.

Becker, Edward R., and Aviva Orenstein, “The Federal Rules of Evidence After Sixteen Years—The Effect of ‘Plain Meaning’ Jurisprudence, The Need for an Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence, and Suggestions for Selective Revision of the Rules,” George Washington Law Review, Vol. 60, 1992, p. 857.

Berger, Margaret A., “The Supreme Court's Trilogy on the Admissibility of Expert Evidence,” Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, second edition, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, DC, 2000.

Cooter, Robert, and Stephen Marks, with Robert Mnookin, “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model Of Strategic Behavior,” The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1982, pp. 225–251.

Gatowski, Sophia I., Shirley A. Dobbin, James T. Richardson, Gerald P. Ginsburg, Mara L. Merlino, and Veronica Dahir, “Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World, “Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2001, forthcoming, pp. 433–458.

Giannelli, Paul C., “Daubert: Interpreting the Federal Rules of Evidence, “Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 15, 1994, pp. 1999–2026.

Groscup, Jennifer L., Matthew T. Huss, Christina A. Studebaker, Kevin M. O'Neil, and Steven D. Penrod, “The Effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in State and Federal Criminal Cases,” University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Law and Psychology Program, draft paper under review, 2000.

Huber, Peter, Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, Basic Books, New York, 1993.

Johnson, Molly Treadway, Carol Krafka, and Joe S. Cecil, Expert Testimony in Federal Civil Trials: A Preliminary Analysis, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, DC, 2000.

Kakalik, James S., Terence Dunworth, Laural A. Hill, Daniel McCaffrey, Marian Oshiro, Nicholas M. Pace, and Mary E. Vaiana, Just, Speedy, and Inexpensive? An Evaluation of Judicial Case Management Under the Civil Justice Reform Act RAND, Santa Monica, CA, MR-800-ICJ, 1996.

McCormick, Charles T., Handbook of the Law of Evidence, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, 1954.

Strongs John W., “Questions Affecting the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence,” University of Illinois Law Forum, 1970, p. 1.

U.S. Government Printing Office for U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, Federal Rules of Evidence, Washington, DC, 1997.

-89-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 90

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.