passing relations and inhabit small niches. They also create great tectonic edifices of knowing, drawing variably on capitalist and other funding sources. Higher educating as a set of knowledge practices can seem highly mobile, imperializing, but also able to strengthen the ‘weak structures’, the locales of learning and knowing. We hope through this methodology and this method we have been able to begin to draw some of the lines that make up these formations which both enmesh and produce us, and engage and enlighten us.
Allen, J. (1992) ‘Feminist Critiques of Western Knowledges: Spatial Anxieties in a Provisional Phase?’, in K.K. Ruthven (ed.), Beyond the Disciplines: The New Humanities, Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities.
Anzaldua, G. (1987) Boderlands/La Frontera, San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Barthes, R. (1978) A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments, trans. R. Hurley, New York: Hill and Wang.
Beckett, D. (1998) ‘Disembodied Learning: How Flexible Delivery Shoots Higher Education in the Foot: Well, Sort Of’, Electronic Journal of Sociology 3(3):1-6, http://www.sociology.org, 16 April 2000
Blumenthal, D. (1999) ‘Representing the Divided Self’, Qualitative Inquiry 5(3):277-392.
Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary FeministTheory, New York: Columbia University Press.
——(1995) ‘Nomads and Other Strangers’, paper presented at Strangers & Others: An International Symposium, Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy, Middlesex University, London, 23-4 November 1995.
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity, London: Routledge.
Castell, M. (1994) ‘The University System: Engine of Development in the New World Economy’, in J. Salmi and A. Verspoor (eds), Revitalizing Higher Education, London: Perg-amon, 14-40.
Clark, M.C. (1999) ‘Challenging the Unitary Self: Adult Education, Feminist Theory, and Nonunitary Subjectivity’, The Canadian Journal of the Study of Adult Education 13(2):39-48.
Code, L. (1991) What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Connelly, F.M. and Clandinin, D.J. (eds) (1999) Shaping a Professional Identity: Stories of Educational Practice, New York: Teachers College Press.
Davies, B. and Harré, R. (1990) ‘Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20:43-63. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~Alock. position/position.htm, 16 April 2001.
Deleuze, G. (1992) ‘What is a Dispositif?’, in T.J. Armstrong (ed.), Michel Foucault, Philosopher, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
——(1988) Foucault, London: Athlone Press
Dimen, M. (1995) ‘The Third Step: Freud, the Feminists, and Postmodernism’, AmericanJournal of Psychoanalysis 55(4):414-37.
Douglas, M. (1991) ‘The Idea of Home: A Kind of Space’, Social Research 58(1):287-307.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Longman
——(1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: the universities, Discourse and Society 4, 2:133-68.
——(1992) Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Geertz, C. (1995) After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.