Abelson, R. P. (1968). Simulation of social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds. ), The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Research Methods (2nd ed., pp. 274–356). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Abelson, R. P. (1997). On the surprising longevity of flogged horses: Why there is a case for the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 12–15.
Abelson, R. P., & Carroll, J. D. (1965). Computer simulation of individual belief systems. American Behavioral Scientist, 8, 24–30.
Abernathy, J. R., Greenberg, B. G., & Horvitz, D. C. (1970). Estimates of induced abortions in urban North Carolina. Demography, 7, 19–29.
Adair, J. G., & Epstein, J. (1967, May). Verbal cues in the mediation of experimenter bias. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
Agnew, N. M., & Pike, S. W. (1969). The science game. An introduction to research in the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ajzen, I. (1982). On behaving in accordance with one's beliefs. In M. P. Zanna, E. T. Higgins, & C. P. Herman (Eds. ), Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 2, pp. 3–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Alfred, R. H. (1976). The Church of Satan. In C. Y. Glock & R. N. Bellah (Eds. ), The new religious consciousness (pp. 180–202). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Allen, C. T., Schewe, C. D., & Wijk, G. (1980). More on self-perception theory's foot technique in the pre-call/mail survey setting. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 498–502.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counter-argumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949–965.