Allen, M. (1997, January). How I got tired of playing connect the dots. Personal Relationship Issues, 4, 8–10.
Allen, M. (1998). Methodological considerations when examining a gendered world. In D. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Handbook of sex differences & similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 427–444). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Canary, D., &Hause, K. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly, 41, 129–144.
Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cook, T., & Leviton, L. (1980). Reviewing the literature: A comparison of traditional methods with meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 48, 449–472.
Cooper, H., &Hedges, L. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hedges, L. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science: The empirical cumulativeness of research. American Psychologist, 42, 443–455.
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for artifact and bias in research findings: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hyde, J., & Plant, E. (1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences: Another side to the story. American Psychologist, 50, 159–161.
Preiss, R., & Allen, M. (1995). Understanding and using meta-analysis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 18, 315–335.
Wachter, K., <&. Straf, M. (1990). The future of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.