Paradise Lost, 1668-1968: Three Centuries of Commentary

By Earl Miner; William Moeck et al. | Go to book overview

Early Comment

WE CAN READILY IDENTIFY THE DECISIVE MOMENT setting Paradise Lost apart editorially from other English poems: the appearance of Patrick Hume's Annotations on Paradise Lost in 1695. But the unquestionable editorial distinction did not occur autonomously. To understand the possibility and nature of Hume's achievement, we require an act of the historical imagination to appreciate the differences between his time and not only ours but that before him. This is scarcely possible without a grasp of numerous conceptual matters that engendered a critical context for understanding and placing Paradise Lost. Many besides Hume matter for that. We may assume that then as now differing readers read the poem differently. But the realm of the knowable from the late seventeenth century is smaller than today. It is not entirely certain that the P. H. whose annotations are of such importance was in fact Patrick (or Philip) Hume, much less that he was a London schoolmaster, as the DNB (Dictionary of National Biography) has it. Given the conservative or traditional stance we have taken, however, we shall speak of him as Hume.

In 1667, when Paradise Lost was first published, and twenty-eight years later when Hume's Annotations appeared, the social and intellectual conditions differed markedly from those we know. Society was unrecognizably more hierarchical. Milton in his most republican moments assumed social degree as a basis of social order. The Hebrew, Greek, and Latin of Hume's notes assume not only for his readers but also for those of the poem a kind of education possessed by but a small part of the population. It is a serious question whether Milton assumed that he might have more than a handful of female readers. In the absence of journalism, a phrase like the popularity of Paradise Lost requires some reflection.

We can gain some sense of the likely readership by recognizing the differing social conditions. English society was not only more hierarchical (and therefore male-dominated). It was also much more religious. Because of that and because, in 1667, political parties did not exist, religion played a larger political and literary role than we readily imagine. Above all, England and London were far smaller than today. Common estimates of the population of the two were, respectively 4,900,000 and 400,000 in 1650, and 5,000,000 and 575,000 in 1700 (Hunter, Before Novels, 112). The small number of people sufficiently educated to read Milton's poem undoubtedly knew each other in some senses better because of their limited size, education at a handful of schools and academies, and two universities, not to mention membership in the clergy and other professions, Parliament and court circles, in institutions like the Royal Society and, above all, churches.

These considerations are not specific or restricted to Milton. Yet the enabling premise of this commentary is that the poem uniquely attracted distinguished commentary at an unparalleled early date. This needs to be shown. England had produced three unquestionably great poets before Milton. Others might be added to Chaucer, Spenser, and Shakespeare, but their importance is not open to serious question. The last of them had died in 1616, fifty-one years before the publication of Paradise Lost, but none of them had had their Patrick Hume.

That central point established, there are some interesting precursors of Hume. There were of course editions of classical authors with skimpy or abundant annotation. In his fashion, Ben Jonson made a classical of a vernacular work by ostentatious citation of classical historians for his Roman tragedy, Sejanus (1605). A very different situation exists with Michael Drayton's Polyolbion, published in two parts (1612, 1622). The eighteen “Songs” making up the earlier part were severally accompanied by his own brief topographical marginalia and “Illustrations” provided by the learned John Selden. “Song IX, ” for example, has fifteen marginalia and twenty-one “Illustrations” varying in length from four lines to six closely printed pages. Since the lines are not numbered, typographical symbols key comment to text. This is not editing as we conceive of it. The six pages on line 417 give Selden room to discourse on Druids, while much else goes unnoted. But the historical lore and background provide, as an edition does, an added layer to the authorial text. Jonson did not rely on his friend Selden, and John Bunyan provided his own marginalia for Pilgrim's Progress (1674). They consist of two main kinds or streams: words and phrases or even sentences explaining the action, both as plot and allegory; and, along with those helps, biblical citations. These resemble Jonson's


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Paradise Lost, 1668-1968: Three Centuries of Commentary
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page *
  • Contents *
  • Preface 9
  • Acknowledgments 11
  • Introduction 15
  • Early Comment 31
  • Book 1 - The Rebel Angels Awaken to Hell's Flames 51
  • Book 2 - Sin Opens the Doors of Hell 97
  • Book 3 - Satan's Hypocrisy Deceives Even Uriel 135
  • Book 4 - God Creates Adam and Eve 165
  • Book 5 - Adam Rids Eve of Satan's Dream 203
  • Book 6 - The Son Expels the Rebel Angels 237
  • Book 7 - Adam and Eve Listen Intently to Raphael 269
  • Book 8 - Raphael Departs After Warning Adam 287
  • Book 9 - The Fall 305
  • Book 10 - The Son Judges and Clothes the Human Pair 335
  • Book 11 - The Vision of Cain Slaying Abel 367
  • Book 12 - The Expulsion 393
  • The Illustrations 421
  • Excursus 1.50 427
  • Excursus 2.921 435
  • Excursus 2.967 439
  • Excursus 3.19 447
  • Excursus 5.791 451
  • Excursus 6.327 457
  • Excursus 6.616 461
  • Excursus 7.126 467
  • Excursus 7.594 471
  • Excursus 8.136 479
  • Excursus 9.512 489
  • Excursus 10.425 495
  • Excursus 11.385 499
  • Excursus 12.553 501
  • Bibliography 505


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 510

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.