Divided Government in Comparative Perspective

By Robert Elgie | Go to book overview

7 Divided Government in Poland

Ania Krok-Paszkowska

Poland has a semi-presidential regime in which 'a popularly-elected fixed-term president exists alongside a prime minister and cabinet who are responsible to parliament' (Elgie, 1999 : 13). The form of divided government is one in which a party (or parties) opposed to the president has (have) a majority in the key house (Sejm), leading to the appointment of a prime minister who is also opposed to the president. However, as Elgie points out in Chapter 1 , the concept of divided government can be used in different ways. In the US literature, which is by far the most prolific source of studies on divided government, the concept is understood in either a purely arithmetical sense, that is, reflecting the distribution of power between the executive and legislative branches of government, or in a behavioural sense, that is, a function of divisive political behaviour. The latter reflects a situation where relations are conflictual whatever the political (partisan) make-up of the different branches of government. Although this case-study will be based upon a purely arithmetical definition of divided government, it is important to understand the specific context in which divided government in Poland has functioned.

For most of the period under consideration, 1989-99, irrespective of whether the president and/or prime minister enjoyed majority support in the legislature, the relationship between parliament, government, and president has been marked by ongoing competence struggles. This was largely due to the nature of the power-sharing deal worked out between the communist and Solidarity élites in the context of the 1989 roundtable negotiations and the sequence of events which followed. The direct election of a president in late 1990 before fully competitive parliamentary elections had been held and before any decisions had been taken as to the future competencies of the presidency laid the ground for a potentially dangerous constitutional conflict. When a fully democratic parliament was elected in autumn 1991, presidential prerogatives based on agreements reached in the roundtable negotiations, that is, created under constraining circumstances, were even more open to question. As existing and newly emerging political actors gained control over one or another institution, they tried to consolidate their power bases. In part,

-127-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Divided Government in Comparative Perspective
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Comparative Politics ii
  • Divided Government in Comparative Perspective iii
  • Preface v
  • Contents vii
  • List of Figures ix
  • List of Tables x
  • Contributors xi
  • 1: What is Divided Government? 1
  • 2: Divided Government in the United States 21
  • 3: Squaring Off 40
  • 4: Divided Government in Mexico's Presidentialist Regime 63
  • 5: Divided Government in Finland 86
  • 6: 'Cohabitation' 106
  • 7: Divided Government in Poland 127
  • 8: Divided Governance 146
  • 9: Divided Government in Germany 167
  • 10: Divided Government in Ireland 182
  • 11: Divided Government in Comparative Perspective 209
  • Bibliography 226
  • Index 239
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 242

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.