Atrocities on Trial: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Prosecuting War Crimes

By Patricia Heberer; Jürgen Matthäus | Go to book overview

Foreword

MICHAEL R. MARRUS

Who could deny, as Hannah Arendt contended in the Postscript to her famous work on the Eichmann Trial, “the inadequacy of the prevailing legal system and of current juridical concepts to deal with the facts of administrative massacres organized by the state apparatus”?1 Certainly not the authors presented in this collection, whose work is so diligently assembled by my colleagues Patricia Heberer and Jürgen Matthäus. I draw evidence from virtually all of our authors of how difficult it was to bring the Holocaust into the courtroom in a way that seems commensurate with that catastrophe—not only in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War, but extending forward, even to our own time.

Despite this inadequacy, Arendt insisted on the urgent need to bring legal judgment to bear, and to do so precisely because the crimes in question were beyond the reach of conventional legal thinking and processes. Her case depended partly on the gravity of the offenses that were at the limits of human experience. Arendt insisted on the unprecedented character of the crimes of Nazism, and in particular those against the Jewish people. She wrote of “unheard-of atrocities, the blotting out of whole peoples, the 'clearance' of whole regions of their native population, that is, not only crimes that 'no conception of military necessity could sustain' but crimes that were in fact independent of the war and that announced a policy of systematic murder be continued in time of peace.”2

Arendt's case for judicial proceedings also depended upon what she believed to be the continuing threat of totalitarian dictatorships. Awesome in scale and significance, the crimes of Nazism were in her view harbingers of a new dark age. It was “hardly deniable that similar crimes may be committed in the future,” she observed. And so however ill-prepared the machinery and however undeveloped the conceptual apparatus, trials had to go forward. “It is essentially for this reason: that the unprecedented, once it has appeared, may be

-ix-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Atrocities on Trial: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Prosecuting War Crimes
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this book
  • Bookmarks
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
/ 327

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.