7
Ideology and the
'End of History'

Both structuralism and the very different approach of Habermas have recently come under attack from the increasingly influential view of the world known as postmodernism. Postmodernism is almost as elusive a concept as ideology itself.1 This is because – like the terms post-Christian, post-Marxist, post-structuralism – it defines itself negatively. Critical and mockingly destructive, it rejects even very broad and tentative attempts to find some foundation for our thought. It turns all our 'isms' into 'wasms' and resolutely turns its back on efforts to give some overall account of our nature and destiny: it wishes to be post-everything, elevates incoherence to its defining feature, and sees even reason itself as the mere tool of a Nietzschean will to power. All this sounds confusingly relativist. However, no thinkers, not even postmodernists, can be consistently relativists without disappearing completely up their own backsides. So the most useful approach will be to ask whether postmodernism is not itself an ideology which will, in turn, suggest that we look at the social and historical context in which it has arisen and flourishes.

Postmodernism is a reaction to, and an extension of, modernity. It is 'in every respect parasitic on modernity: it lives and feeds on its achievements and on its dilemmas'.2 By 'modernity' here is meant the Enlightenment project of achieving increasing material and moral progress for humankind through the application of science and reason. This project, like the Christianity it was in many ways intended to supercede, involved an account of where we have come from, where we are going, how we can get there, and why we should bother to go. Building on the subversion of the whole of the

-71-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Ideology
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Concepts in the Social Sciences *
  • Title Page *
  • Contents *
  • Preface *
  • Preface to the Second Edition *
  • 1: The Career of a Concept 1
  • 2: Marx 9
  • 3: The Marxist Tradition 19
  • 4: The Non-Marxist Tradition 31
  • 5: Ideology in the United States 44
  • 6: Science, Language and Ideology 56
  • 7: Ideology and the 'End of History' 71
  • 8: Conclusion 80
  • Notes 84
  • Further Reading 94
  • Bibliography 100
  • Index 109
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this book
  • Bookmarks
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
/ 111

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.