Defending the Society of States: Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society

By Jason Ralph | Go to book overview

3
International Society—The Duty Either to
Extradite or Prosecute

Chapter 2 discussed alternative sources of international law. This chapter builds on that discussion by asking who has the right to prosecute individuals for violations of international law. The two questions (and thus the two chapters) are of course closely linked. Whether a state can claim the right to prosecute those violating international law depends on the scope of the law and the legitimacy of the processes that made that law. The solidarist who recognizes the legitimacy of a universal consensus on 'war crimes', for instance, will likely support a state's claim to assert jurisdiction over those who commit such acts, even though that state might not have a direct connection to the crime. On the other hand, a positivist unwilling to accept the invocation of a universal consensus would be interested to know whether specific treaties exist indicating an agreement between states over the exercise of criminal jurisdiction or whether the prosecuting state has some kind of connection to the particular crime.1 The positivist position on the source of international law, in other words, is the starting point for the pluralist position on universal jurisdiction. To assert jurisdiction when a treaty is not present would put at risk the two principles of pluralist international society. First, it would be undemocratic as a state would be holding an individual to account before a law he, by not being a citizen of that state, had not consented to. Indeed, the actions that the prosecuting state might deem unlawful may very well have been sanctioned by the perpetrator's state and may even have been conducted on behalf of that state. This would not necessarily make those actions democratic (the state may after all be a dictatorship), but to

1 Other than the universality principle, it is generally considered that a state can claim juris-
diction based on three other principles: the territorial principle, where a state claims jurisdiction
over crimes committed on its territory; the national principle, where a state claims jurisdiction
over crimes committed by their nationals (active nationality principle) or against their national
(passive personality principle); and finally the protective principle, which allows a state to
prosecute acts that threaten its security even when they are committed by foreigners abroad.
Malanczuck, Akehurst's, 109–12.

-55-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Defending the Society of States: Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 244

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.