Methods in Medical Ethics

By Jeremy Sugarman; Daniel P. Sulmasy | Go to book overview

7
Casuistry

Albert R. Jonsen

One of the defining features of modern medical ethics is the presence of persons trained in the disciplines of moral philosophy and moral theology as participants in the conversation with health professionals, scientists, and legal scholars about moral questions in medicine and science. The philosophers and theologians naturally desired to bring to that conversation methods of analysis that are identified with their disciplines. When they entered the conversation, they quickly learned that in medical care the moral questions are stimulated by cases, particular instances in which actual persons are being treated in specific ways in definite circumstances. Scholars might have recalled the words of Aristotle, “Agents are compelled at every step to think out for themselves what the circumstances demand, just as happens in the arts of medicine and navigation … Prudence is not concerned with universals only; it must also take cognizance of particulars, because it is concerned with conduct, and conduct has its sphere in particular circumstances” (Aristotle 1976, II, ii, 1104; IV, vii, 1141).

This intense concentration on the particulars of medical cases presented a problem for those trained in moral philosophy who worked on these issues in the early part of modern medical ethics. That discipline had, for many years, cultivated an approach to ethics that turned away from cases and toward theory. One of the seminal books of modern moral philosophy, G. E. Moore's Principia Ethica, opened with the assertion that there is “a study different from Ethics and one much less respectable, the study of Casuistry … (although Ethics cannot be complete without it).” He goes on, “The defects of Casuistry are not defects of principle; no objection can be taken to its aim and object. It has failed because … the casuist had been unable to distinguish, in the cases which he treats, those elements upon which their value depends” (Moore 1903, 4-5). Many of Moore's predecessors in Continental and British moral philosophy had, since the late Renaissance and Enlightenment, reflected on the natural, psychological, and logical foundations of moral reasoning and constructed theories to ground the rationality (or in some instances the irrationality) of morality. After Moore, most moral philosophers in the English tradition turned their attention to the meaning of the peculiar vocabulary of moral discourse: What do words such as “right” and “good” mean, since they do not appear to refer to the objects of empirical perception? Casuistry, a “less respectable branch of moral philosophy” in Moore's words, was hardly noticed. Philosophers neither analyzed cases nor did they reflect, in anything but a

-104-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Methods in Medical Ethics
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Acknowledgments xi
  • Contributors xiii
  • Part I - Overview 1
  • 1: The Many Methods of Medical Ethics (Or, Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird) 3
  • 2: A Decade of Empirical Research in Medical Ethics 19
  • Part II - Methods 29
  • 3: Philosophy 31
  • 4: Religion and Theology 47
  • 5: Professional Codes 70
  • 6: Legal Methods 88
  • 7: Casuistry 104
  • 8: History 126
  • 9: Qualitative Methods 146
  • 10: Ethnographic Methods 169
  • 11: Quantitative Surveys 1 192
  • 12: Experimental Methods 207
  • 13: Economics and Decision Science 227
  • Part III - Relationships and Applications 245
  • 14: Research in Medical Ethics: Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia 247
  • 15: Research in Medical Ethics: Genetic Diagnosis 1 267
  • 16: Reading the Medical Ethics Literature: a Discourse on Method 286
  • Index 298
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 314

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.