Methods in Medical Ethics

By Jeremy Sugarman; Daniel P. Sulmasy | Go to book overview

16
Reading the Medical Ethics
Literature: A Discourse on Method

Daniel P. Sulmasy

What constitutes a good paper or book in medical ethics? This important question cannot be decided merely by whether or not one agrees with the conclusion of a paper or a book! As the previous chapters should make clear, there are many fine works in medical ethics, written by talented authors employing a wide variety of methods. The best of these works genuinely expand knowledge, expose hidden assumptions, challenge prevailing convictions, make rigorous arguments, enrich understanding, or illuminate contentious issues in fresh ways. However, frankly speaking, the medical ethics literature is also filled with chaff—often sincere chaff, but chaff nonetheless. The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview on how to read the medical ethics literature critically, separating the golden grains of wheat from the inconsequential chaff.

The many methods of medical ethics make this a very challenging task. Many readers of the literature of medical ethics do not have a background in particular research disciplines. Clinicians, for example, are often keenly interested in medical ethics, yet their training rarely equips them to read studies about ethics sensibly and critically. Many scholars in the field of medical ethics read research studies conducted by scholars in other disciplines, often examining the same questions they themselves are examining. However, they may be unfamiliar with the methods and disciplinary assumptions of these, and unsure how to apply this work to their own inquiry. The editors of medical journals are often scientists for whom any paper that does not present empirical data in numerical form is considered “opinion.” They might have little experiential basis for distinguishing an editorial from a philosophical essay or a qualitative empirical study, let alone judging whether these are good or bad pieces of scholarship. In such cases, editors generally rely upon the judgments of peer reviewers. However, without sufficient background, they might even have difficulty determining who should play the role of “peer.” Finally, many persons who are neither clinicians nor scholars are interested in the writings of medical ethicists. Since the issues of medical ethics affect the lives of almost everyone, all readers of the medical ethics literature have an interest in distinguishing sound bites from sound scholarship.

This chapter provides suggestions about aspects of medical ethics research that readers might want to look for in assessing the quality of scholarship in the field. If there is to be

-286-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Methods in Medical Ethics
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page i
  • Contents v
  • Preface vii
  • Acknowledgments xi
  • Contributors xiii
  • Part I - Overview 1
  • 1: The Many Methods of Medical Ethics (Or, Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird) 3
  • 2: A Decade of Empirical Research in Medical Ethics 19
  • Part II - Methods 29
  • 3: Philosophy 31
  • 4: Religion and Theology 47
  • 5: Professional Codes 70
  • 6: Legal Methods 88
  • 7: Casuistry 104
  • 8: History 126
  • 9: Qualitative Methods 146
  • 10: Ethnographic Methods 169
  • 11: Quantitative Surveys 1 192
  • 12: Experimental Methods 207
  • 13: Economics and Decision Science 227
  • Part III - Relationships and Applications 245
  • 14: Research in Medical Ethics: Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia 247
  • 15: Research in Medical Ethics: Genetic Diagnosis 1 267
  • 16: Reading the Medical Ethics Literature: a Discourse on Method 286
  • Index 298
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 314

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.