1. The only recent attempt to deploy genre as a concept in the discussion of photography is in Paul Frosh’s book, The Image Factory (Oxford: Berg, 2003).
2. Steve Neale, ‘Questions of Genre’, Screen (Oxford University Press, volume 31, number 1, spring 1990), p 45.
3. Steve Neale, Genre (London: BFI, 1980).
4. Neale, ‘Questions of Genre’, Screen, p 46.
5. Hal Foster, et al., Art Since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism (London: Thames & Hudson, 2004).
1. Sigmund Freud, ‘Civilization and its Discontents’ , Civilization, Society and Religion, Pelican Freud, Volume 12 (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1989), p 279.
2. Raymond Williams, Keywords (London: Fontana, 1988).
3. See for example: Helmet and Alison Gernsheim, The History of Photography (London: Oxford University Press, 1955); Jean-Claude Lemagny and André Rouille, eds., A History of Photography (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987); Naomi Rosenblum, A World History of Photography (London: Abbeville, 1984); Michel Frizot, ed., A New History of Photography (Cologne: Könemann, 1998) [1994 in French]; The History of Japanese Photography, Kaneko Ryüichi et al. (Houston: Museum of Fine Arts, 2003).
4. The essay has been reprinted several times since 1971; see Linda Nochlin, Women, Art, and Power and Other Essays (London: Thames & Hudson, 1989).
5. Karl Marx, ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’, Marx/Engels: Selected Works (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1980), p 96.
6. Karl Marx, ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’, p 96.
7. The book was originally based on a 1937 exhibition and catalogue called Photography, 1839–1937, held at the Museum of Modern Art, New York. See Beaumont Newhall, The History of Photography: From 1939 to the Present Day (New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1964).
8. See Christopher Phillips, ‘The Judgement Seat of Photography’, The Contest of Meaning, R. Bolton, ed. (London: MIT, 1992), p 196.
9. See, for example, the work of Abigail Solomon-Godeau, especially ‘Calotypomania’ and ‘Cannon Fodder’; both in Photography at the Dock (Minneapolis: Minnesota Press, 1995).
10. John Tagg, The Burden of Representation (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988), p 118.
11. See Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge (London: Tavistock, 1985).