Ockham's Razor Cuts Both Ways: The Uses and Abuses of Simplicity in Scientific Theories

By Mole, Phil | Skeptic (Altadena, CA), Spring 2003 | Go to article overview

Ockham's Razor Cuts Both Ways: The Uses and Abuses of Simplicity in Scientific Theories


Mole, Phil, Skeptic (Altadena, CA)


IN CARL SAGAN'S NOVEL CONTACT, heroine Ellie Arroway manages to travel through wormholes into uncharted regions of the universe, rendezvous with intelligent extraterrestrial life, and return safely to earth to tell her colleagues about her amazing journey. (1) There's only one problem: no one believes her. Ellie's entire adventure occurred within a span of a few moments, and observers did not even see her spacecraft leave its launch site. Unable to document her reported experiences, Ellie's colleagues conclude that there is simply no compelling evidence that her adventure actually happened.

Of course, as readers of the novel, we know that Ellie is right and her colleagues are wrong. Why then don't they believe her? They doubt her story because, as good scientists, Ellie's peers examine all hypotheses using the honored principle of Ockham's Razor. That is, with all other things being equal, "the simplest hypothesis is most likely to be correct." They scrutinize Ellie's elaborate claim, involving mind-boggling excursions far beyond the range of established science, and find the story to be fantastically improbable. Even Ellie must admit that the finely honed blade of Ockham's Razor seems to slice her tale to pieces.

Although Ellie and her plight are fictitious, her harrowing brush with Ockham's Razor raises interesting questions for skeptics. Like Ellie's scientific colleagues, we have learned to accept Ockham's Razor as a powerful tool for weeding out bogus theories. But how do we know that the maxim "simpler is better" will always lead us down the royal road to truth? How can we say, prior to further investigations, that simple theories are automatically more likely to be true than complex theories? Might not Ockham's Razor, thought by many skeptics to be the surest weapon against pseudoscience, simply be an unproven philosophical assumption? If so, perhaps we will share the fate of Ellie's peers and reject the correct answers simply because they don't conform to prior expectations.

This article presents a brief historical sketch of the principle, and cites examples of the misuse of Ockham's Razor to support dubious theories and how that misuse led to the rejection of good science. This discussion leads to an attempt to identify the limitations and qualifications needed to apply the principle properly when choosing among various theories. I then try to determine what justification, if any, we can have for using Ockham's Razor, and argue that skeptics should learn to use the principle carefully in conjunction with other criteria of theory selection. I hope to show that Ockham's Razor is a dangerous weapon if mishandled, but that those who follow the proper safety precautions will find it to be a very helpful tool for evaluating theories.

The History of Ockham's Razor

The principle of Ockham's Razor is named after William of Ockham (1285-1349), a distinguished medieval philosopher and theologian. Contrary to popular assumptions, Ockham did not invent the principle that has become associated with him. The idea that simplicity and efficiency are important advantages of a theory dates back at least to Aristotle, who stated that "the more perfect a nature is, the fewer means it requires for its operation." (2) Centuries after Ockham's time, Isaac Newton would also cite the principle of simplicity in his Principia Mathematica: "We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances." (3)

Ockham emphasized the principle of parsimony as an antidote to the various unwarranted assumptions he perceived in the philosophy of his time. He used a number of different formulations of the principle in his writings. He stated, for example, that "it is futile to do with more what can be done with fewer," and perhaps most famously, that "plurality should not be assumed without necessity." (4) A common term for this concept is parsimony. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ockham's Razor Cuts Both Ways: The Uses and Abuses of Simplicity in Scientific Theories
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.