Overcoming Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection in Bad-Faith Cases: Bald Assertions of Bad Faith Should Not Be Accepted by Courts as a Warrant to Plaintiffs to Rummage through Claims Files

By Jebo, James R. | Defense Counsel Journal, April 2003 | Go to article overview

Overcoming Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection in Bad-Faith Cases: Bald Assertions of Bad Faith Should Not Be Accepted by Courts as a Warrant to Plaintiffs to Rummage through Claims Files


Jebo, James R., Defense Counsel Journal


IN THE 1970s, a sequence of California decisions created a new tort--one for bad faith denial of an insurance claim. (1)

In the beginning, insurance policies were treated like any other type of contract. Relying on the common law rule announced in 1854 by the Exchequer Chamber, Hadley v. Baxendale, (2) courts limited damages to those contemplated by the parties at the time the contract was formed. (3) The business of insurance, however, is much different from other commercial pursuits. Individuals and companies obtain insurance to hedge against risks and potential losses they often are not economically able to suffer. Insurance companies have an unequal bargaining power. They are able to pass litigation costs off to insureds in the form of higher premiums, while an uninsured person or company is not able to do that. Insureds must in most cases accept adhesion contracts, with little or no power to bargain over details. Insurance policies, moreover, are extremely complicated documents, containing countless warranties and exceptions to coverage that often are not fully understood by the insured.

The tort of bad-faith denial of claims originated because of the peculiar nature of insurance contracts and an appreciation that the principles of contract law are inadequate to protect policyholders. (4) Simply put, states that have adopted this tort require insurance companies to act in good faith, and fairly deal with their insureds. (5)

Although about 45 American states have adopted the bad-faith tort for first-party claims, the type of bad-faith claim on which this article concentrates, the law is relatively new and in a state of flux. One area often litigated is the insured's right to inspect the insurer's claims file during discovery. Plaintiffs argue that it is the only way to prove bad faith, while defendants contend that information is protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine, or both. A 2001 decision by the Ohio Supreme Court, Boone v. Vanliner Insurance Co., (6) has brought this issue into sharp focus. The court held that in a bad-faith case, all claims file materials created before the claim was denied are discoverable. The unique part of the decision was that the court found that materials showing an insurer's lack of good faith are unworthy of protection.

The mere allegation of bad faith on the part of the insurer, however, should not result in a blanket exception to the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. Several cases, including Vanliner, have held that any information or documentation collected or produced before a claim is denied was prepared in the normal course of business and thus is not eligible for discovery immunity. This is an overgeneralized inference that ignores the principles behind the work product doctrine. To balance the competing interests, courts should require a factual showing of bad faith, not a mere allegation--that is, there must be specific facts and examples pleaded on which a reasonable judge could infer that there was a question of insurer bad faith.

BAD FAITH AND PRIVILEGES

A. A Bit of History

In the mid to late 1800s, states began regulating the insurance industry in response to its growth and widespread corruption. (7) In 1944, the U.S. Supreme Court held in United States v. Southeastern Underwriters Ass'n that insurance transactions were commerce and thus subject to federal regulation. (8) In response, Congress in 1945 enacted the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. [section] 1101 et seq., which provides that federal laws such as the Sherman and Clayton acts and the Federal Trade Commission Act, apply only to insurance transactions in areas overlooked by state law. Thus, states are given a great deal of discretion in the field of insurance law, and this can lead to widely divergent opinions.

Like other contracts, insurance policies carry an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing originating from common law. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Overcoming Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection in Bad-Faith Cases: Bald Assertions of Bad Faith Should Not Be Accepted by Courts as a Warrant to Plaintiffs to Rummage through Claims Files
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.