How Transportation Hedgers Cope with Overtaxing Rules

By Schap, Keith | Futures (Cedar Falls, IA), February 1991 | Go to article overview

How Transportation Hedgers Cope with Overtaxing Rules


Schap, Keith, Futures (Cedar Falls, IA)


How transportation hedgers cope with overtaxing rules

"Without careful tax planning, Uncle Sam could make more on a fuel hedge than the taxpayer," says Ed Paules, a tax and accounting arbitrage specialist with Continental Bank's risk management group.

That caution has been especially important since August, when the Iraqi incursion into Kuwait motivated "thoughtful consideration of fuel hedging"--as one airline official redundantly put it -- by numerous transportation company executives who had previously disdained it.

"Typically, such a shift in view is a response to a negative event," says Todd E. Petzel, vice president of research at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. It also is "one of the worst possible reasons to think about hedging," he adds. Experienced hedgers, he continues, "all share a common characteristic: They look forward."

Thus it is that financial engineers urge clients to consider the tactics that might serve their needs -- forward contracts, hedges using futures, hedges using exchange-traded options and various over-the-counter products such as swaps, caps or collars. They then urge them to choose the most cost-effective method to protect against price risk, given their long-term business goals.

But, along with everything else that fuel hedgers must consider, Paules says, is the fact that "forwards, futures, options and swaps all have different tax and accounting impacts, which can be as important when designing hedging strategies as the markets themselves."

As a result, hedgers must deal with a tax arbitrage. In addition to choosing tactics that make business sense in the ordinary way, they must decide which will produce the most favorable tax treatment. This is especially true operating in what can be called the "hidden" transportation sector.

Reflecting the ordinary view of the transportation sector, the Dow Jones Transportation Index includes 19 "common carriers": nine airlines, six railroads, three trucking companies and one shipping line.

But any highway traveler is also aware that numerous manufacturing companies, especially in chemicals and food products, manage vast fleets of trucks dedicated to their special cargoes. Those transporters face the same fuel price risk as the common carriers, but for them, the hedging decision process can be trickier.

"There's more tax planning room in commodities but also more traps," Paules warns.

According to Robert R. Baer, a senior tax officer with the Continental Bank risk management group, tax law derives from three sources: Congress, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the courts.

Three branches

Congress passes laws. Then, to define how a law applies, the IRS may issue a regulation that has the power of law. Should a dispute arise over an application, the parties may take the issue to court. The eventual decision becomes another part of the law.

Just such a process led to the arbitrage to which Paules refers.

The actual laws and regulations say little about commodities. The elements that do apply to hedging for the most part address interest rates with regard to financing and foreign tax credits. Also, some pretty detailed rules limit U.S. companies' ability to take foreign tax credits.

But Regulation 1256, which deals with hedging concerns, insofar as they are dealt with, contains little to help fuel hedgers -- or really anyone hedging commodity price risk.

The basic problem for manufacturing companies wishing to hedge any of their commodity price risk is that the tax law, more by omission than design, treats cash forwards and futures positions as capital assets.

A typical manufacturing company usually wants to avoid capital losses because it can only offset capital losses against capital gains and because it generates almost no capital gains or losses in the ordinary course of business.

Therefore, capital losses warrant no tax deduction even though the tax law allows a three-year carry back and a five-year carry forward -- that is, if a company has a capital gain any time in the last three or the next five years, it can offset a capital loss. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

How Transportation Hedgers Cope with Overtaxing Rules
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.