Select Committee Power: And How to Plug into It: They're Not the Glamorous Face of Power-Broking but Parliament's Select Committees Are Where the Real Political Influence Is Wielded. They're the Backstage Powerhouse Providing the Grunt for Those with Starring Roles in the Theatre of Government. Savvy Business Leaders Keep Tabs on These Legislative Hothouses and Use Them to Influence the Business Environment. (Government)

New Zealand Management, July 2003 | Go to article overview

Select Committee Power: And How to Plug into It: They're Not the Glamorous Face of Power-Broking but Parliament's Select Committees Are Where the Real Political Influence Is Wielded. They're the Backstage Powerhouse Providing the Grunt for Those with Starring Roles in the Theatre of Government. Savvy Business Leaders Keep Tabs on These Legislative Hothouses and Use Them to Influence the Business Environment. (Government)


Worried about new legislation that may impact upon your industry, company or organisation? Want to tell legislators what you think in an environment in which your views must be heard? Then take a closer look at the way in which parliament's select committees now work.

Some feel that you cast your vote every three years and then take your chance as to what happens in between times. And, in the days of the first-past-the post government, that was pretty much the way it happened. It is no longer the case today. What has altered is not just the arrival of MMP, but the way parliament's select committee system has changed to adapt to it.

Traditionally, select committees--the committees of members of parliament that consider new bills that are before the house--were creatures of the government of the day. The government had a majority and appointed the committee chairs. As a result, while you were always free to make submissions, your chances of influencing the ultimate outcome were limited. Governments invariably had their way.

With the introduction of MMP all of that changed. Select committees became the engine room of the legislative process.

Today three important committees are chaired by members of opposition parties. Education and Science is chaired by New Zealand First's Brian Donnelly, Primary Production by National's David Carter, and Local Government and Environment by Greens' co-leader, Jeanette Fitzsimons. Another, Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, is chaired by Peter Dunne whose United Future supports the governing coalition, while not being part of it.

Nor does the governing coalition often have a majority on committees these days. In fact currently the only committee with an outright majority is the Government Administration Select Committee. On all the other committees--there are thirteen subject committees--the support of at least one other party and on some, two other parties, is required before the government can command a majority.

All of which means we have moved into an era where governments cannot rely on select committees to rubber-stamp their legislative proposals.

An example of this is the Smokefree Environments (Enhanced Protection) Amendment Bill which started life as a small bill from Tuku Morgan, was adopted by the Government as it progressed and was significantly beefed up during the select committee process. Another is the Employment Relations Bill which was subjected to intense scrutiny and amendment.

The current Resource Management Amendment which initially was a Simon Upton (National) bill, was changed to shore up Green support in the first Labour coalition, and changed again to a Labour Progressive bill with a dash of United Future in it most recently.

Right now the Land Transport Management Bill is undergoing similar changes to better reflect submissions and the fact that the Greens have less influence now than they had when the bill was initially drafted.

Today's select committees are also more willing to use their powers of inquiry than they were previously; even if this may be against the coalition government's own interests or wishes. The Health Committee's recent inquiry into the health effects of cannabis, a Green initiative, is one such example.

The advent of MMP has made select committees-more powerful and also, arguably, more objective. The old "them and us" approach is no longer very productive in a situation where support for your stance on a specific issue may well come from a party that is generally implacably opposed to your political philosophy.

All of which means that the chances for an individual or an organisation to influence the final shape of legislation using the select committee process is greater than it was in the past.

Understanding the manner in which the legislative process operates; tightly-argued written submissions; a persuasive and well-informed appearance before the committee; backed up by briefings to influential MPs where possible can bring significant change to legislation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Select Committee Power: And How to Plug into It: They're Not the Glamorous Face of Power-Broking but Parliament's Select Committees Are Where the Real Political Influence Is Wielded. They're the Backstage Powerhouse Providing the Grunt for Those with Starring Roles in the Theatre of Government. Savvy Business Leaders Keep Tabs on These Legislative Hothouses and Use Them to Influence the Business Environment. (Government)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.