A Sterner Test: One of the Weaknesses of the Current Body of Research on How Firms Use EVA, the Performance Measurement System Developed by Stern Stewart & Co, Is That Much of the Practical Evidence Has Come from Stern Stewart Itself. Josie McLaren Reports on a CIMA-Sponsored Study into the Development of EVA in Three Firms in New Zealand. (Economic Value Added)

By McLaren, Josie | Financial Management (UK), July-August 2003 | Go to article overview

A Sterner Test: One of the Weaknesses of the Current Body of Research on How Firms Use EVA, the Performance Measurement System Developed by Stern Stewart & Co, Is That Much of the Practical Evidence Has Come from Stern Stewart Itself. Josie McLaren Reports on a CIMA-Sponsored Study into the Development of EVA in Three Firms in New Zealand. (Economic Value Added)


McLaren, Josie, Financial Management (UK)


The increasingly popular philosophy of benefit-sharing is that the explicit recognition of secondary stakeholders such as employees, suppliers and customers maximises value to the primary stakeholders--ie, the shareholders. Economic value added (EVA) is one measurement system that's consistent with this belief. Managers can set a goal of EVA maximisation in order to achieve the primary objective, recognising the secondary stakeholders explicitly via value drivers that are identified throughout the business.

EVA has been vigorously promoted by its developer, Stern Stewart & Co. It claims that the system can be cascaded through an organisation to business units and even to processes and products. The rationale is that there are no conflicts of interest between the planning and control function, or between shareholders and managers. It's argued that managers think like owners and so have the incentive to achieve the primary objective.

Last year a CIMA-sponsored research project considered two state-owned enterprises in New Zealand and investigated differences in EVA usage between these firms and a third, publicly quoted, company. The organisations were of different sizes (see table 1) and operated in separate industries, but they could all be described as decentralised businesses with the overriding objective of maximising shareholder wealth.

At the sub-unit level, the balanced score-card was used to provide a direct focus on value drivers. This was seen to complement EVA. Companies 1 and 2 introduced the balanced scorecard after implementing EVA, but company 3 already had a scorecard in place. On its introduction, EVA was slotted straight into the scorecard framework as a financial measure. The interviewees identified the following factors as critical for a successful implementation:

* support from the chief executive and members of the board;

* a phased introduction;

* the treatment of EVA as a project, complete with a project leader;

* the provision of training for all staff intending to work with EVA.

None of the companies saw EVA as a complete measure of performance. They all made use of extra measures--for example:

* payback period for investment decision-making (all three companies);

* a focus on earnings before interest and tax both internally and externally (companies land 3);

* the balanced scorecard for its focus on value drivers (all three companies).

The main reason they cited for this continued use of other measures was that staff, board members and outsiders--shareholders, analysts or the media, for example--didn't really understand the measure. Also, EVA was seen as subjective because of the adjustments that needed to be made (see panel, left). Other measures were thought to lend more objectivity. The issue of comprehension shouldn't be underestimated. Internally, people need to be trained to ensure that EVA is fully understood. External parties have always focused on profit. They continue to do so and their lack of understanding persists.

The research revealed an evolutionary process in the use of EVA. The stages (see figure 1) reflect the length of time it had been used.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

* Company 1 had come full circle. It had moved from using EVA only at firm level to using it at business-unit level. At the end of the study it was using EVA at corporate level for its core integrated units.

* Companies 2 and 3 were both using EVA at corporate and business-unit level, as advocated by Stern Stewart. The indications were that they would continue using EVA at this level--ie, the evolutionary process was complete at the second stage.

There were several reasons for the evolutionary process in company 1. Its use of the measure at business-unit level created certain problems that led it to pull back to corporate-level usage--clear evidence of the failure of the EVA philosophy in this case. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Sterner Test: One of the Weaknesses of the Current Body of Research on How Firms Use EVA, the Performance Measurement System Developed by Stern Stewart & Co, Is That Much of the Practical Evidence Has Come from Stern Stewart Itself. Josie McLaren Reports on a CIMA-Sponsored Study into the Development of EVA in Three Firms in New Zealand. (Economic Value Added)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.