# Mathematics and the Legal Imagination: A Response to Paul Edelman

By Meyerson, Michael I. | Constitutional Commentary, Summer 2002 | Go to article overview

# Mathematics and the Legal Imagination: A Response to Paul Edelman

Meyerson, Michael I., Constitutional Commentary

I was very flattered to read Paul H. Edelman's review of my book, Political Numeracy. (2) He is a first-rate mathematician and legal thinker, so his kind words are very much appreciated and his criticisms are taken seriously. (3)

My goal in writing the book was to explore different aspects of the multifaceted relationship between mathematics and the Constitution. The Constitution itself contains many numbers, and the very heart of democracy, the concept of "majority rule", is an arithmetic concept. I wanted to examine the reasoning behind the framers' numerical choices--why 2/3 of the Senate is needed to ratify treaties; why slaves were counted as 3/5 of a "person"; and why we have two houses of Congress and 538 presidential electors. (4) I also wanted to explore the nature of logic, both the logic used in the presentation of legal arguments and the dangers that result from not questioning the fundamental postulates of one's own reasoning. On the whole, Professor Edelman has positive things to say about my approaches to these first two goals. (5)

My final goal was to explore how an understanding of various areas of modern mathematics could inform and improve our thinking about the constitution. This is the part of the book which receives Professor Edelman's strongest criticisms. He asserts that the use of what he terms "mathematical metaphor" is essentially a waste of time. As he put it, the more one knows about mathematics and the law, "the less persuasive these metaphors tend to be."

I suspect that Professor Edelman's background as a mathematician is preventing him from seeing that mathematics can trigger a non-mathematical imagination and create mental images that permit new ways of thinking about non-mathematical topics.

Mathematics is not simply a tool for resolving problems. Despite its reputation for being tedious, inaccessible, and boring, mathematics is actually a glorious way of thinking, with a deeply aesthetic quality. The poetry of mathematics can illuminate all manner of thought.

Consider, for example, this passage from Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.'s pre-Civil War essay, The Autocrat of the Breakfast Table: "All economical and practical wisdom is an extension of the following arithmetical formula: 2 + 2 = 4. Every philosophical proposition has the character of the expression a + b = c. We are mere operatives, empirics, and egotists until we learn to think in letters instead of figures." (6)

All thinkers, especially those engaged in legal analysis, can benefit from this admonition to reason abstractly, in the universal rather than the particular. Math does not serve as a mere "metaphor," but creates an effective means for reexamining one's thoughts.

Likewise, James Madison used a simple mathematical picture in Federalist No. 10, to describe how a national government minimizes the evils of majority factions:

```
Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties
and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the
whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of
other citizens; or if such a common motive exists, it will be
more difficult for all who feel it to discover their own
strength, and to act in unison with each other. (7)
```

Obviously, when Madison referred to a "sphere" he was not contemplating a literal geometric shape. Rather, he was creating a mental picture of a container increasing in size, to encompass a larger geographic area. Moreover, his basic point was inherently mathematical: The larger the voting population, the more difficult it is to maintain a permanent working majority.

I believe that what Laurence Tribe wrote about the legal import of modern physics holds for modern mathematics as well: "my conjecture is that the metaphors and intuitions that guide physicists can enrich our comprehension of social and legal issues. …

If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.
Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.
Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

Project items include:
• Saved book/article
• Highlights
• Quotes/citations
• Notes
• Bookmarks
Notes

#### Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

#### Cited article

Mathematics and the Legal Imagination: A Response to Paul Edelman
Settings

#### Settings

Typeface
Text size Reset View mode
Search within

Look up

#### Look up a word

• Dictionary
• Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

### How to highlight and cite specific passages

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

## Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

## New feature

It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit OpenDyslexic.org.

To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

## Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.