Stare Decisis V. the "New Authority": The Michigan Supreme Court's Practice of Overruling Precedent, 1998-2002

By Delaney, Sarah K. | Albany Law Review, Spring 2003 | Go to article overview

Stare Decisis V. the "New Authority": The Michigan Supreme Court's Practice of Overruling Precedent, 1998-2002


Delaney, Sarah K., Albany Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

The 2000 election for the Michigan Supreme Court went down in history as Michigan's most expensive judicial race ever. (1) In addition to having spent in excess of fifteen million dollars, the campaign was tarnished by vicious mud-slinging and accusations by both the Republican and Democratic parties. (2) Three open seats on the Michigan Supreme Court, previously held by conservative justices appointed by Governor John Engler, spurred this unprecedented battle. (3) Although Michigan Supreme Court Justices are elected in a nonpartisan election, they are nominated at party conventions, and they receive the support of the Republican and Democratic parties. (4) When the dust settled from the 2000 election, the Republican incumbents had prevailed over their Democratic-backed counterparts, and a conservative bloc remained in the Michigan Supreme Court. (5)

During the election, the Democratic party's attacks focused on the court's practice of overturning precedent, a trend that increased dramatically from 1998 to 2002. (6) The Democratic Party contended that this increase reflected a conservative shift in the Michigan Supreme Court created by the Engler-appointed justices, and that these conservative justices were overturning precedent to change the law to favor corporations--especially insurance companies. (7)

The criticism directed toward the conservative majority remained after the 2000 election, and was voiced not only by politicians but also through dissent within the court chambers. (8) Why has the new court, beginning with the Engler-appointed justices, felt the need to overturn precedent at nearly twice the rate of the era before them? What do these opinions tell Michigan constituents about the ideologies of the justices sitting on their highest court? Is there truth behind the allegations made by the Democratic Party during the 2000 election, or is the conservative majority simply returning the Michigan Supreme Court to its "proper role of interpreting the law, not creating it"? (9)

This study seeks to answer these questions by examining cases from 1998 to 2002 in which the majority chose to overturn past case law. (10) By analyzing the majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions written by each Michigan Supreme Court Justice, this study will identify individual Justices' voting patterns and the ideologies that underlie their respective decisions.

II. DEFINING CONSERVATISM AND LIBERALISM

Before categorizing the Michigan Supreme Court decisions and their authors as conservative or liberal, it is necessary to define these terms as they exist as political ideologies. Conservatism embodies the principle that individuals hold inherent rights that are best protected by limiting the power of the government. (11) Therefore, conservative values include limited government, autonomous institutions, and individual freedom. (12) Limited government interference enables a society to establish cultural entities over generations, which, in turn, produces institutions "shaped in accordance with the demands made on them; their defects and unintended consequences will become apparent and, under pressure for reform, reshaped." (13) Reflecting the belief that social institutions evolve from the demands placed on them by individuals, conservatism embraces capitalism, based on its proven success over time in promoting the ideals of democracy. (14) Conservative values include the right to retain the fruits of one's labor, individual initiative, and the duties one has to his society based on tradition. (15)

In contrast to conservatism, liberalism places the greatest emphasis on the civil and political rights of each individual. (16) Liberalism values individual freedom over traditional community values and "demand[s] a substantial realm of personal freedom ... which the state should not intrude upon, except to protect others from harm." (17) While liberalism traditionally supported limited governmental interference and laissez-faire capitalism, contemporary liberalism has shifted, and now promotes the government's role in advancing individual rights. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Stare Decisis V. the "New Authority": The Michigan Supreme Court's Practice of Overruling Precedent, 1998-2002
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.