Paradigmatic Distinctions between Instructionally Relevant Measurement Models

By Fuchs, Lynn S.; Deno, Stanley L. | Exceptional Children, May 1991 | Go to article overview

Paradigmatic Distinctions between Instructionally Relevant Measurement Models


Fuchs, Lynn S., Deno, Stanley L., Exceptional Children


Paradigmatic Distinctions Between Instructionally Relevant Measurement Models

Developing accurate, feasible measurement systems to enhance instructional decision making represents a long-standisng goal of educational research, development, and practice. The notion of adjusting student programs in response to student performance data is a basic principle of effective teachidng (e.g., Eubanks & Levine, 1983; Goodman, 1985; Hoffman & Rutherford, 1984; Rieth, Polsgrove, & Semmel, 1981). Research on teacher planning (e.g., Peterson & Clark, 1978) suggests that teachers enhance student achievement when they accurately assess student knowledge and responsively adapt instruction.

Historically, informal methods, such as classroom ooservation of pupil performance, student response to teacher questioning, and scores on daily assignments, have dominated teacher assessment practice (see Mirkin & Potter, 1982; Salmon-Cox, 1981). Developed within the framework of behavioral psychology during the 1960s, more formal measurement systems were designed to enhance instructional planning. These measurement systems, such as Individually Guided Education (Klausmeier & Ripple, 1971), Individually Prescribed Instruction (Glaser, 1966), and Precision Teaching (White & Haring, 1980), required specification of behavioral objectives and carefully aligned, criterion-referenced assessment.

In the past decade, curriculum-based assessment has become a widely used, related education term. As defined by Tucker (1987), curriculum-based assessment incorporates three key features: Test stimuli are drawn from students' curricula; repeated testings occur across time; and the assessment information is used to formulate instructional decisions. This definition is straightforward; it clearly establishes the salient features shared by all forms of curriculum-based assessment. Yet, despite this clarity about the commonalities across types of curriculum-based assessment, confusion persists about important distinctions among the many variants of curriculum-based assessment.

The purpose of this paper is to identify two major models of instructionally relevant measurement, into which most forms of curriculum-based assessment can be categorized. We refer to the first model, which is highly related to the behaviorally oriented measurement systems of the 1960s, as specific subskill mastery measurement. Most current curriculum-based assessment systems fall into the mastery measurement model. The second model, which we term general outcome measurement, represents a new approach to instructionally relevant measurement. Developed over the past decade, curriculum-based measurement (CBM) (Deno, 1985; Fuchs, 1986; Shinn, 1989) is an example of general outcome measurement.

In this article, we first provide background and rationale for the development of general outcome measurement. Second, we explain the predominant model, specific subskill mastery measurement, by presenting a case study and describing the model's distinguishing features. Next, we illustrate general outcome measurement with a CBM case study and review the distinguishing features of this alternative approach. Finally, we discuss how measuring general outcome indicators can bridge traditional and contemporary assessment paradigms to form an innovative approach to the use of measurement for instructional planning.

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE FOR

GENERAL OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The purpose of developing a model for measuring general outcome indicators was to provide teachers with reliable, valid, and efficient procedures for obtaining student performance data to evaluate their instructional programs. The need to develop a general outcome measurement model arose from our earlier experience with the curriculum-based assessment procedures originally recommended within the Data-Based Program Modification (DBPM) moodel (Deno & Mirkin, 1977). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Paradigmatic Distinctions between Instructionally Relevant Measurement Models
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.