Archaeology under the Judiciary: Ayodhya 2003

By Chakrabarti, Dilip K. | Antiquity, September 2003 | Go to article overview

Archaeology under the Judiciary: Ayodhya 2003


Chakrabarti, Dilip K., Antiquity


Keywords: India, Ayodhya, heritage, politics

After more than a decade after its demolition, the December 1992 destruction of the sixteenth-century mosque in Ayodhya remains a powerful heritage issue. The site is considered sacred by Hindus as the birthplace of their god Rama, and the mosque's demolition caused the loss of about 2000 Indian lives in Hindu-Muslim rioting across India and led to the destruction of Hindu temples in the neighbouring countries of Pakistan and Bangladesh.

On 5 March 2003, the Lucknow Branch of the Allahabad High Court directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to ascertain by excavation whether a Hindu temple had stood at the site. Excavations began on March 12 2003, with an initial court directive to report within four weeks, then allowed to continue until June 15. To prevent anything untoward happening, including tampering with finds during the excavations, the Court imposed tight security control around the work and made provisions for its monitoring by representatives of interested parties.

Access to the excavation site was closed to the general public and ASI supervisors and workmen carried identity cards. The digging tools were listed and the excavated artefacts stored in a specially secure tamper-proof environment. The court-approved 'monitors' belonged to groups such as 'Visva Hindu Parishad' ('Global Organization of the Hindus'), 'Babri Masjid Action Committee' (Action Committee for (the protection of) the mosque built by Babar'), Indian History Congress, etc. Disputes of various kinds have been rife from the very beginning of the work.

The purpose of this note is two-fold. Firstly, to draw attention to the character of these disputes, which shows how bitterly this heritage battle is being fought. Secondly, I argue that this essentially religious dispute has been converted into a bitterly fought--and now judicial--contest by two opposing groups of Indian historians and archaeologists whose motivation has never been to preserve Indian heritage but to capture the power structure and the resources of the historical and archaeological research in the country.

The disputes which have surfaced after the court order are of two kinds. First, it is no longer solely a Hindu-Muslim dispute because the members of the Buddhist and Jain religious communities have also staked their claims to the site. A Jain forum is convinced that the demolished mosque was at the site of a sixth century AD Jain temple and it wants the site to be handed over to them. The claim that a Buddhist monastery--and not a temple to Rama--was demolished to make way for the mosque was put forward in a petition to the court by at least three organisations including the All-India Confederation of (neo-Buddhist) Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes. The other disputes are of a more technical character and range in scope from the adequate representation of Muslims in the excavation work-force to the declaration of a lack of faith in the integrity of the ASI by some Muslim litigants. A similar lack of faith was also declared by some 'monitors' present at the site, especially those acting as the representatives of the Babri Masjit Action Committee and the Central Sunni Waqf Board. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Archaeology under the Judiciary: Ayodhya 2003
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.