Ideas on the Revolution in Military Affairs and the Nature of Low-Intensity Conflict

By Jordaan, Evert; Vrey, Francois | Strategic Review for Southern Africa, May 2003 | Go to article overview

Ideas on the Revolution in Military Affairs and the Nature of Low-Intensity Conflict


Jordaan, Evert, Vrey, Francois, Strategic Review for Southern Africa


ABSTRACT

The aim of this article is to discuss and assess the tension between ideas that underpin the revolution in military affairs (RMA) and the changing nature of post-Cold War conflict with specific reference to the nature of low-intensity conflict (LIC). The United States' (US) view of an RMA is used as a point of departure as it forms part of the mainstream thinking on the debate. It is argued that the conventional and inter-state war paradigm in the current RMA-debate seems largely irrelevant to the nature of LIC, which is the most probable type of conflict strong powers will face in future. The terror attacks on the US on 11 September 2001 reinforced this critique of the RMA vision and indicated the rise of asymmetric strategies. Hence this article discusses the tension between RMA-thinking and the nature of LIC, also considering the impact of September 11. It addresses the preparation for certain scenarios, existing national values, operational thinking and the use of military instruments.

1. INTRODUCTION

The success of the United States (US) military during the 1991 Gulf War and the performance of American high-technology weapons, as well as Respectively academic assistant and lecturer in the Faculty of Military Science, University of Stellenbosch. This article was written before the 2003 war in Iraq. the pace of innovation in computers and sensors have convinced many military analysts that the US is on the verge of a revolution in military affairs (RMA). (1) The US Department of Defence has, however, not embraced all the drastic changes proposed by some RMA-advocates to bring about revolutionary change. Therefore, change within the US military will most probably remain evolutionary in kind. (2) The optimism surrounding the RMA-thesis in the US is focused on advances in precision munitions, data processing and other modern technologies judged to transform the nature of future war. (3) Although many countries partake in the debate on RMA-issues, the US military is the leader in this field and continues to define the direction of mainstream thinking. (4) The RMA-thesis has however been questioned in terms of feasibility and its relevance in dealing with future security challenges (even in Europe). (5) The conventional military focus of the RMA-debate in the face of the remaining prominence of low-intensity conflict (LIC) after the Cold War became an object of criticism. The current RMA-debate acknowledges LIC, but it does not elaborate upon it. (6) This negation is the result of current strategic thinking and preparation for future inter-state wars whilst national values and other societal variables play a role as well.

The first section of the article discusses the changing nature of conflict in the post-Cold War era and highlights the prominence of LIC, especially within the Third World. The following section deals with the lack of consensus among scholars and states on the meaning of the concept RMA, and what qualifies as an RMA. In conclusion, the influence of the terror attacks on 11 September 2001 is assessed with specific reference to the tension between the ideas of an RMA and the realities of LIC.

2. THE CHANGING NATURE OF POST-COLD WAR CONFLICT

According to Hippler, military conflicts can be ordered in a three tiered conflict spectrum. (7) The lowest level of conflict is the shortest in duration and has the lowest levels of force and input. The highest level of conflict is a strategic nuclear war. Total wars, such as the Second World War, are placed in the category of high-intensity conflict, while the Korean and Vietnam Wars are referred to as medium-intensity conflicts. The conflicts below the high and mid-level conventional wars are referred to as low-intensity conflicts. In this context, LIC is defined as "politico-military confrontation between contending states or groups below conventional war and above the routine peaceful competition among nations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ideas on the Revolution in Military Affairs and the Nature of Low-Intensity Conflict
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.