Arbitration Agreements Are Subject to Scrutiny

The Register Guard (Eugene, OR), August 17, 2003 | Go to article overview

Arbitration Agreements Are Subject to Scrutiny


Byline: ON THE JOB by Dan Grinfas For The Register-Guard

Question: My new employer required me to sign an agreement to arbitrate any claims that arise in the course of my employment. I've been unemployed and really need this job, so I went ahead and signed. But is it legal for an employer to make an arbitration agreement a condition of employment?

Answer: It depends. The courts have upheld an employer's right to require arbitration of disputes, but many courts have found specific arbitration agreements to be unfair and unenforceable, and employees often challenge mandatory arbitration agreements by arguing that they are unconscionable.

This is a complicated area of the law because we've had a series of sometimes-conflicting decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal courts. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes Oregon, has in the past struck down arbitration agreements as being oppressive. Recently, the 9th Circuit has ruled that such agreements are enforceable, but that decision is under review.

The U.S. Supreme Court decided in 1991 in Gilmer vs. Interstate Johnson Co. that an employer may compel job applicants, employees and former employees to arbitrate employment-related disputes, provided that the employer follows certain guidelines. The Supreme Court also held in Circuit City Stores Inc. vs. Adams in 2001 that agreements to arbitrate claims under federal discrimination laws are enforceable. Still, employees have argued that arbitration agreements are coercive.

In May 2002, the Texas Supreme Court held in a case involving Halliburton Co. that an employee, James Myers, agreed to binding arbitration of all employment claims simply by continuing to work after the employer advised workers that it was adopting an alternative dispute resolution program. Myers hadn't signed any agreement, but the court concluded that he accepted the company's offer by continuing to report for duty after learning of the change.

The court found that Halliburton's arbitration agreement wasn't unconscionable because the company as well as the employee was bound to arbitrate claims, and the agreement provided protections for the employee, including the employee's promise to pay most of the arbitration costs and to provide the employee up to $2,500 to consult with an attorney of his choice.

In another recent case, McMullen vs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Arbitration Agreements Are Subject to Scrutiny
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.