The Effect of Interaction Levels on Student Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Web-Mediated versus Traditional Delivery

By Glenn, Lowell M.; Jones, Christopher G. et al. | Journal of Interactive Learning Research, Fall 2003 | Go to article overview

The Effect of Interaction Levels on Student Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Web-Mediated versus Traditional Delivery


Glenn, Lowell M., Jones, Christopher G., Hoyt, Jeff E., Journal of Interactive Learning Research


This analysis examined the contrasts between online and traditional delivery methods in terms of the impact on student learning and satisfaction for similar course material. It built on the work of other researchers who have asked these types of questions for individual courses and relatively small sample sizes. However, this analysis expanded the number of courses under review and has drawn a larger sample of students than previous studies. The analysis sought to control for student and teacher characteristics, course content, assessment procedures, and so forth, and evaluate student's perceptions of interaction in the two delivery modes. It asked questions about whether varied types of interaction make a difference in a student's performance and satisfaction with the course.

**********

Web-mediated instruction is the fastest growing sector of distance education (U.S. Congressional Web-based Education Commission, 2000). Browser-based delivery has evolved in less than ten years from static HTML pages coupled with email and list-serves to integrated course management suites. Naturally, with the move from the traditional lecture hall to the cyber-classroom, there have been questions regarding instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Some studies of learning outcomes indicate that student performance levels remain about equal but that student perceptions of the course differ (Johnson, Aragon, Shaik, Palma-Rivas, 2000). While these studies have contributed to an overall understanding of the effectiveness of web-mediated instruction, they do little to explore the factors responsible.

One such factor is the level of course interaction. Learning theorist Laurillard (1997) posited that student-teacher interaction is a key component in academic learning. In her "Conversational Framework," she identified four types of activity essential to learning: Discursive, Adaptive, Interactive, and Reflective. Interactive activities refer to the "task/action/feedback" cycle students experience in their own world as they operate on the ideas presented by the instructor. Large class sizes, independent study, and some web-based courses forgo high levels of interaction to achieve instructional efficiency. If Laurillard is right, reduced interaction should result in reduced learning. To date, little empirical research, if any, has been done that correlate distance learning interaction levels with student outcomes. Such research could be an invaluable aid in the design of web-mediated instruction, especially in light of the communication technologies now available in web-ware.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study investigated course interaction and the impact such interaction may have had on student learning. Specifically, this study addressed the following research questions:

1. When controlling for student and teacher characteristics, course content, and course assessment, is there a general perception that online courses are less interactive than traditional? If so, do students also perceive a difference in the structure or support levels between online and traditional?

2. Does the level of course interaction explain a significant portion of the difference in student performance and student satisfaction? If so, what is the relative importance of each interaction modality (instructor-student, student-student, student-course structure, student support)?

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

Comparative Analyses of Traditional versus Online Instruction

The education literature is replete with comparative studies of traditional versus technologically mediated instruction. Such studies formed the basis of two meta-analyses that synthesizes research to date Clark (1983) and Liao (1998). These meta-analyses compared conventional lecture/demonstration versus interactive multimedia, computer-aided instruction, or computer simulations. Results were mixed. In his review and meta-analysis of comparative research on the impact of media on learning, Clark concluded, "media does not influence learning under any conditions" (p. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Effect of Interaction Levels on Student Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Web-Mediated versus Traditional Delivery
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.