Will British Ban Spur FDA to Act? Critics Remain Skeptical of the FDA's Announced Plans to Take a Serious Look at Possible Links between Use of Antidepressants by Children and Violent or Suicidal Acts

Insight on the News, February 16, 2004 | Go to article overview

Will British Ban Spur FDA to Act? Critics Remain Skeptical of the FDA's Announced Plans to Take a Serious Look at Possible Links between Use of Antidepressants by Children and Violent or Suicidal Acts


Byline: Kelly Patricia O'Meara, INSIGHT

For several years a TV commercial has been running in the United States in which a small black circle with a sad face slowly, almost desperately, flops across a stark white screen while a narrator soothingly explains that depression doesn't have to be a part of everyday life. But with help from the antidepressant drug being advertised the sad face becomes a smile, happily floating across the screen to indicate how beautiful life can be with the aid of the mind-altering drug.

Microscopic writing at the bottom of the TV screen advises that depression "may be due to a chemical imbalance," a kind of assurance that the alleged mental disorder for which the drug is recommended is a product of a measurable physical malady confirmed by scientific evidence. Although "may" is the operative word, a "chemical imbalance" sounds scientific. Never mind, experts say, that there is nothing in the medical literature to establish what qualifies as a healthy "chemical balance," let alone what does not.

Critics of the use of mind-altering drugs for alleged mental disorders contend that it is precisely this kind of misinformation that has led tens of millions of people to rush to these new "feel-good" drugs which, in fact, have turned the mood in some of those taking them from down to deadly.

That may be why a recent decision by the British Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) may tilt the balance in the debate whether antidepressants hurt more than they help. The CSM is an arm of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the United Kingdom's equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The information the CSM provided is so damning that manufacturers of many of the most-widely prescribed antidepressants may find it necessary to add a disclaimer to their feel-good commercials saying that the drugs may cause violence and suicide in children younger than 18. And it is precisely this finding that led the United Kingdom effectively to ban or "contraindicate" the use of most antidepressants by children youn-ger than 18.

Last year, after concerns were raised about patients becoming suicidal while taking antidepressants, the CSM conducted a review of all available evidence provided by the respective pharmaceutical companies about their selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The CSM found the "risks of treating depressive illness in under 18s with certain SSRIs outweigh the benefits of treatment." The risk outweighs the benefit.

Of the seven antidepressants under review Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro, Luvox, Paxil, Effexor and Prozac four (Zoloft, Celexa, Paxil and Effexor) were found to increase the rate of self-harm; two (Lexapro and Luvox) had no clinical trial data available in which to make a decision. Only Prozac, the mother of psychopharmacological intervention, was found to have a favorable risk/benefit ratio.

The CSM further revealed that despite the widespread use of SSRIs in children an estimated 50,000 in Great Britain alone only two of the seven antidepressants, Zoloft and Luvox, had been approved for use in children 18 years or younger who had been clinically (i.e., subjectively) diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Whether the drug was effective could not be demonstrated for Zoloft, Celexa, Paxil and Effexor, and there were no data about the efficacy rate in Lexapro or Luvox, the mind-altering drug that one of the Col-umbine school shooters, Eric Harris, was taking at the time of his deadly assault.

Although the CSM report includes the seven major antidepressants on the market, two of them, Paxil and Effexor, were banned for children earlier in the year by the United Kingdom's regulating board. This same action was followed up in the United States when, in September, Connecticut's Department of Children and Families announced it would stop giving Effexor to children under the state's care because of the possible link to increased suicide risk. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Will British Ban Spur FDA to Act? Critics Remain Skeptical of the FDA's Announced Plans to Take a Serious Look at Possible Links between Use of Antidepressants by Children and Violent or Suicidal Acts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.