Collection Development and Maintenance across Libraries, Archives, and Museums: A Novel Collaborative Approach

By Edwards, Phillip M. | Library Resources & Technical Services, January 2004 | Go to article overview

Collection Development and Maintenance across Libraries, Archives, and Museums: A Novel Collaborative Approach


Edwards, Phillip M., Library Resources & Technical Services


Note: An earlier draft of this paper was presented on April 17, 2003, at the 2003 Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association Conference held in New Orleans, Louisiana, April 16-19, 2003.

This paper proposes guidelines for collaboration across libraries, archives, and museums that incorporate an understanding of how collections develop, the social systems that impart value to the collected items, and the needs of the research population. Future directions for professional practice implied by these general theoretical principles may enable collecting institutions to provide a high level of service to patrons while retaining their defined individual identities, expertise, and access (albeit sometimes indirectly) to the original physical objects.

The proposal relies on institutional relationships. To comprehend how relationships between collecting institutions can be used to preserve the historical record, one must understand why materials that document the historical record matter. The solution suggested here--that of a managed de-accessioning and accessioning cycle of selected and, therefore, historically important materials between different types of institutions--is an adaptation of the ideas presented by both Atkinson and Bake. (1) Emphasis is placed on fostering active relationships between individual institutions in order to preserve original documents that have attained significant contemporary social value and potential future usefulness. Reshaping day-to-day practice and designing systems modeled on the proposed themes could lead to Pareto-optimal outcomes for all participating organizations.

**********

In an electronic environment, preservation processes and the nature of collections maintained by libraries, archives, and museums are experiencing dramatic transformations. Traditionally, the types of materials collected and the research purposes that these materials support defined collecting organizations. Libraries "tend to collect material which exists in multiples, whereas other groups work with items which, by definition, are unique." (2) The use patterns for libraries tend to center on content to a greater degree than the book- or text-as-artifact focus often observed in other collecting organizations. Increases in the volume of published material, the resulting competition for budgets and shelf space, and the promise of salvation through technology have led many collection administrators to make regrettable decisions--in hindsight--regarding the wholesale de-accessioning and destruction of primary materials from their institutions" collections in exchange for access to imperfect surrogates. These decisions were criticized in Double Fold: Libraries and tide Assault on Paper by Baker, and a lengthy response to this critique, titled Vandals in the Stacks? A Response to Nicholson Baker's Assault on Libraries, was recently published by Cox. (3) General interest in the topic of long-term preservation in libraries, archives, and museums was generated as a result of this public debate.

In response to Double Fold, several members of the professional community mention editorially that libraries are not archives. (4) Librarians deal primarily with providing access to information, while archivists deal with information access and retention of evidence. (5) Museums, by comparison, "operate under a mode of indirect, mediated access" to the collected materials. (6) Despite these differences in function and focus, Levy and Marshall claim that contemporary "boundaries between libraries, museums, and archives, although intuitively clear, are not so easy to draw in practice." (7) Each type of institution is subject to practical constraints on their actions as a result of budgetary, spatial, mad scope limitations. These limitations result in both selection and weeding decisions, and the practices and processes through which materials are retained have implications for how these institutions function in the long term. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Collection Development and Maintenance across Libraries, Archives, and Museums: A Novel Collaborative Approach
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.