The Draft European Constitution

By Kallmer, Jonathan S. | Contemporary Review, January 2004 | Go to article overview

The Draft European Constitution


Kallmer, Jonathan S., Contemporary Review


THE European Union (EU) has been one of the most successful creations in the history of political institutions. For the past half-century, harmonization of the policies of many European countries has helped make war in Western Europe unthinkable, enhanced the living standards of millions of people, and enshrined into law a vast array of important social, political, and human rights. Integration has fundamentally altered the way Europeans think about their relationships to one another, to their governments, and to the outside world.

In recent years, following the consolidation of the single market and the creation of a common currency, the Euro, EU leaders have undertaken a good bit of collective soul searching. The objective of this self-examination has been nothing less than to redefine and clarify the organization's raison d'etre. Though it was not required by any prior treaty or agreement, the individuals charged with leading this assessment decided that Europe needed a constitution. Only a document carrying the gravity of a constitution, they believed, could properly articulate the purposes of the Union, enumerate the basic rights of its people, and describe its institutional structure and policymaking mandate.

For sixteen months leading up to this past summer, and under the leadership of former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, 105 representatives of current and future EU Member States worked to draft a Constitution for Europe. (On 1 May this year the European Union will expand from 15 to 25 Member States with the addition of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Cyprus, and Malta.) On 20 June, 2003, the delegates to the Convention on the Future of Europe submitted their draft constitutional document to the full EU, to be considered by the Member States in an inter-governmental conference (IGC) that began in early October.

Sadly, the document produced by Mr. Giscard and the delegates almost totally fails to achieve the objectives set out for it. In particular, the draft constitution suffers from three broad categories of deficiency. First, it does not resemble a constitution. The language of the document is vague, verbose, and indecisive, and therefore woefully insufficient as a matter of process. Second, the document fails to cure the 'democratic deficit' by which the Union has so long been characterized. Neither in form nor in substance does the draft constitution bring power closer to the people. In fact, it may do precisely the opposite. Third, and most important, the document infringes too greatly on the sovereignty of the individual Member States. By proposing types of integration that would strip countries of some of their most essential functions, the draft constitution puts the Member States in the impossible (and unintended) position of choosing between Europe's integration and their own independence.

Virtually all of the document's flaws spring from its vast ambition, but the problem is not that the constitution is ambitious. Constitutions should be ambitious. The problem is that it is ambitious in ways that exacerbate the problems it was meant to remedy, undermine the fundamental principles of integration, and conflict with the idea of a constitution. Mr. Giscard has urged the Member States to adopt his text in something near its current form. That would be a tragic mistake. The European Union has done great things for both Europe and the world, but part of the virtue of doing great things is recognizing those that cannot be done. As discussed more fully below, all of the draft constitution's flaws flow directly or indirectly from the failure to do just that.

The 'Constitution' Does Not Resemble a Constitution

The essential merits of a constitution are found as much in the process as in the substance. An effective constitutional document not only sets out the core rights of citizens and the basic structures of government, but does so in a way that is clear, concise, definitive, and accessible. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Draft European Constitution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.