Staking out New Boundaries: Last Year Brought Unexpected News from Freddie Mac, Which Sparked Renewed Debate over Regulatory Reform of the Secondary Market Entities. Reform Legislation Stalled as 2003 Drew to a Close. What's the Outlook for Action in 2004?

By Morse, Neil J. | Mortgage Banking, January 2004 | Go to article overview

Staking out New Boundaries: Last Year Brought Unexpected News from Freddie Mac, Which Sparked Renewed Debate over Regulatory Reform of the Secondary Market Entities. Reform Legislation Stalled as 2003 Drew to a Close. What's the Outlook for Action in 2004?


Morse, Neil J., Mortgage Banking


THE MORTGAGE FINANCE INDUSTRY and many in the nation's capital markets and economic policy circles held their breath for a moment last summer when news of accounting irregularities by Freddie Mac surfaced. Renewed concern, though less pronounced, returned in the fall when reports surfaced about Fannie Mae having a minor accounting glitch of its own.

Since then, the news has reinforced calls for more oversight of the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), but not yet produced action.

It is one thing for a private corporation to have these problems, even if self-inflicted, but when the companies are twin economic engines like Fannie and Freddie--which together carry on their balance sheets $1.6 trillion in assets and have outstanding debt totaling $1.5 trillion--there's a tendency to be more judicious before pulling the trigger on regulatory reform.

That is not to say no one has noticed. There have been numerous suggestions for change, most notably proposals to tighten the regulatory relationship between the two GSEs and the federal government.

These suggestions have largely centered on legislative ideas aimed at establishing a new, independent regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that would bulk up, or simply replace, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO). OFHEO is currently the regulator of the housing GSEs for safety and soundness. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is charged with oversight of the GSEs' efforts to serve their housing mission.

A reform bill, the Secondary Mortgage Market Enterprises Regulatory Improvement Act (H.R. 2575), drafted by Rep. Michael Oxley (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, would create a new independent regulator inside the Treasury Department, a move with considerable support--including from the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA).

In a letter to key House and Senate banking committee members, MBA stated that "Treasury's proven expertise in financial regulation can only serve to strengthen the ... process. The GSEs should not use their special advantages to compete in the primary market or expand into other markets that are already well served by others."

At MBA's Annual Convention & Expo in San Diego in October, Chairman Robert M. Couch, CMB, said the association polled its members "for input" and discovered a "remarkable consensus" favoring the Treasury oversight.

There are two components of the current oversight of the GSEs that cover financial safety and soundness and the housing mission of the two secondary market entities. Moving oversight to Treasury, which already regulates national banks and thrifts, could involve giving the department authority over new activities and products of the GSEs (the housing mission), which is currently regulated by HUD. Combining both elements of oversight under one regulatory body inside Treasury, in effect, could put a more proactive focus on "safety and soundness" for the two secondary market giants.

Proposed changes to the current system of oversight for the GSEs can produce more than the typical political outcry on Capitol Hill, and in some cases in the capital markets. For example, when a Treasury Department official suggested in testimony eliminating a $2.25 billion line of credit with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the outrage was heard near and far. Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Kentucky), who serves on the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs and the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions, said the "markets went haywire" at the suggestion.

In the last two years, the topic of suggested changes in GSE oversight have been floated in various congressional hearings, conferences and legislative proposals. Some of these changes have included:

* new oversight of the GSEs' capital requirements and monitoring of their portfolio risks;

* doing away with presidentially appointed directors (to end their political lobbying efforts);

* providing a regulator with the authority to put either GSE into receivership if it becomes severely undercapitalized; and

* weakening or removing the government-sponsored enterprise status for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Staking out New Boundaries: Last Year Brought Unexpected News from Freddie Mac, Which Sparked Renewed Debate over Regulatory Reform of the Secondary Market Entities. Reform Legislation Stalled as 2003 Drew to a Close. What's the Outlook for Action in 2004?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.