Socialized Medicine Now - without the Wait
Watzman, Nancy, The Washington Monthly
By now, you've seen a million stories on the Canadian health care system, and perhaps even read a few. If so, you've discovered that they all apply the same formula. First, like a slap in the face, comes the horror story: In Orange County, California, a woman goes into business for herself, giving up her health insurance--and discovers she has breast cancer. She takes to selling flowers from her garden in a desperate effort to keep up with her bills. Next come the terrifying statistics: Americans spend more than $750 billion--or nearly 14 percent of the GNP--on health care each year. If costs continue to rise at current rates, they'll eat up 37 percent to rise at current rates, they'll eat up 37 percent of the GNP by 2030. Yet 28 percent of U.S. citizens lack basic health care; 35 million are uninsured--and nearly two thirds of them have jobs.
Now the emergency is clear, and the stage is set for a hero. But as he comes into focus, our savior looks a lot less like a chiseled Mountie on a galloping steed than a . . . "Worthwhile Canadian Initiative," to borrow the inspirational title for a Most Boring Headline contest in The New Republic a few years back. The stories, you see, are carefully "balanced." On the plus side, they point out that "our neighbors to the north" spend only 9 percent of their GNP on a tax-financed national health program, yet everybody is covered, from the wealthiest businesswoman to the poorest, unemployed IV-drug user. Then comes the downside: Canadians must wait longer than Americans do for high-tech treatments such as coronary bypasses, MRIs, CAT scans, and even cancer treatments. It appears to be a trade-off, conclude The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Miami Herald, and Walter Cronkite. Who can say, they shrug, which system is better? Will America ever reform its health care system, and will Canada be the model? One thing is certain: Only time will tell.
Hey! How about a little American initiative? If our system's broke--as everyone from Physicians for a National Health Program to the Heritage Foundation agrees--let's fix it. That means choosing the best model we've got--the Canadian system--and eliminating the bugs. After all, the Canadians don't have to give us a blueprint, just a beginning.
Despite the utopian claims of universal health care advocates, the problems with the Canadian system are real. Making it right for us will take hard work and, above all, brutal honesty about its flaws. But the end result will be advanced, humane medical care for all Americans. That it will also be billions of dollars cheaper than the jury-rigged, inequitable system we've got now--well, that's just added incentive to do the right thing.
On New York City's Park Avenue, doctors understand the subtleties of putting together a practice. The artwork is understated but expensive, the New Yorkers uncreased and up-to-date. The nurse is as gentle as a Swedish masseuse, the gown as ample as your backside. And the doctor, one of the best in his field, gives you his undivided attention for an hour.
At $200 a visit, this is American medicine at its best. For the worst, walk 30 blocks uptown, to the "Medicaid mills" of Harlem. These "doctors' offices," which actually boast no doctors except on the requisite citi licenses, serve thousands of New York's poorest people. A recent Washington Post story described the care provided at one such institution: A clerk collects a patient's Medicaid card, scribbles out an Rx, and sends him on his way. Given this sham service, why do dozens of people pass through these revolving doors every day? Because many doctors in the city refuse to accept patients on Medicaid.
Now head northwest to the village of Tofino in the Pacific Rim region of Canada's Vancouver Island--one of the few places on earth that harbors more eagles than people. It also harbors the only hospital in 100 miles: a low-slug green building with one doctor, one nurse, one ambulance, one helipad, and nine clean yellow rooms. …