The Pro-Police Review Board

By Vogel, Jennifer | The Nation, January 6, 1992 | Go to article overview

The Pro-Police Review Board


Vogel, Jennifer, The Nation


The Pro-Police Review Board

The outcry in Minneapolis for an external review process for misconduct complaints against the police has risen and fallen over the years. It reached a new height after a pair of 1989 incidents. In the first, an elderly black couple were killed in a botched January 25 drug raid by Minneapolis police. Cops threw a stun grenade into Lloyd Smalley and Lillian Weiss's home thinking it was a center for drug sales; the grenade started a fire that killed the sleeping couple. A few days later police leaked the claim that Smalley, 71, had died with "traces of cocaine" in his system; no disciplinary action was taken against the officers involved. A week later, the controversy got even hotter when Minneapolis police broke up a party at the Embassy Suites Hotel attended mostly by black college students. Partygoers accused the police of physical brutality and racial slurs.

Protests broke out in front of City Hall, Mayor Don Fraser's office and the state Capitol. Community leaders "rammed the issue down the City Council's throat," in the words of one community activist. That April, Council President Sharon Sayles Belton appointed a twenty-two-member Civilian Review Working Committee to look at police review boards around the country and come up with a proposal for Minneapolis.

The critical question was whether the board would have subpoena power, which - in the view of national experts on civilian review as well as local activists and working committee members - amounts to the difference between a board with the legal means to do substantive investigations and one whose powers are marginal at best. The ordinance passed by the Council actually contained a tentative provision giving the board subpoena power, contingent on the state legislature's approval. But six months after the ordinance was passed, Sayles Belton announced she wasn't going to ask the legislature for subpoena power. "The police lobby would have squelched any attempts to get subpoena power, which they are vehemently opposed to," she said. She added that police have to cooperate with the board as a condition of their employment, and that civilian witnesses would probable come forward on their own.

Both claims are questionable. Although the civilian review ordinance does require police cooperation with any "reasonable requests for information," it doesn't spell out what that means. Nor does it spell out the consequences for failure to comply, except to say the Mayor could be drawn into the fray. As for civilians voluntarily coming forward to testify against police - particularly people from minority communities, where most complaints occur - cooperation is anything but guaranteed. Police forces traditionally have ways of bringing pressure to bear on people they view as agitators.

"Subpoena power is important to reach civilians," says Ann Viitala, a lawyer who served on the working committee and was later appointed to the review board. "People aren't necessarily going to want to come forward and put their name on the line against a police officer. At least if they can say they had to, it can make a difference."

By the time the ordinance was passed, a number of community leaders had already denounced the process. But the Coalition for Police Accountability (which includes members of the N.A.A.C.P., the National Lawyers Guild and Women Against Military Madness) pledged its continued support, calling the draft a workable compromise and a step up from the police department's Internal Affairs Unit.

The group Sayles Belton was deferring to in her decision not to ask for subpoena power was the Minneapolis Police Federation, the city's police union. Historically, the federation has been a formidable - and consistently reactionary - force in the state legislature and in city government. Federation representatives, including attorney Gregg Corwin, have been opposed to the idea of civilian review from the beginning. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Pro-Police Review Board
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.