"A Jury of Our Peers": Is That Right? the IADC A Jury of Our Peers Committee Reports on Projects around the United States to Improve the Workings of the Civil Jury System

By Mooney, Harry F.; Chen, William et al. | Defense Counsel Journal, April 2004 | Go to article overview

"A Jury of Our Peers": Is That Right? the IADC A Jury of Our Peers Committee Reports on Projects around the United States to Improve the Workings of the Civil Jury System


Mooney, Harry F., Chen, William, Kraik, Spencer J., Defense Counsel Journal


      I do not know whether the jury is useful
   to those who have lawsuits, but I am certain
   it is highly beneficial to those who judge
   them; and I look upon it as one of the most
   efficacious means for the education of the
   people which society can employ.

   --ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE (1835)

JOHN STUART MILL observed that the jury system is at the very heart of democracy. Therefore, to preserve the very essence of democracy, its citizens must be willing to serve on juries.

For this reason, the A Jury of Our Peers Committee was established in 1996 by then president of the International Association of Defense Counsel, George Gore. As an active trial lawyer, he was impelled by his observation that the triers of fact at most civil jury trials in the United States did not represent a true cross-section of the community.

President Gore's charge to the committee was "to survey and evaluate all federal and state jurisdictions to find out how they summon, select and empanel jurors" and to "recommend changes so that jurors who sit on the trial of a civil case truly represent a cross-section of the community and that those jurors who pass judgment on plaintiffs and defendants in civil actions will be drawn from juror pools that fairly represent all segments of the community." The project, one of the first issues tackled in Mr. Gore's presidency, underscores the IADC's recognition of the importance of the jury system to the American justice system.

With this in mind, the committee embarked on a mission to find ways to make the civil jury system more representative of all segments of society. It was a project intended to benefit society as a whole.

The issues faced by the committee were not new. For instance, one law review article as far back as 1930 decried the fact "most educated classes were exempt from jury duty." (1) There have been a number of recent jury reform movements dating from the 1970s which have led to improvements in the administration of such essentially administered jury service systems and have opened jury service to more citizens. (2)

In 1994, Arizona and New York adopted major jury reforms. Arizona's project focused on the trial aspects of jury service, but it also implemented changes in public education about jury service and jury trials, improvement of juror source lists and requests for deferral and excusal from service. (3) New York conducted a major overhaul of its jury reform system, implementing significant reform and source lists, terms of service, qualifications, exemptions, excusals, deferrals, as well as jury selection and service. (4)

The IADC committee conducted a survey of all U.S. jurisdictions and found that many citizens sought and received exemption from jury service. The committee also discovered that juror source lists often did not reflect entire populations eligible for service. In light of its findings the committee made recommendations for legislative and rule changes and proposed public education to enlighten the citizenry about the benefits of jury service. Indeed, the committee drafted its own model statute relating to selection of prospective jurors, which appears as Appendix A to this article. The survey of U.S. jurisdictions, originally conducted in 1997, has been updated as of September, 2003.

The IADC committee also has noted that other organizations, including the National Center for State Courts and the American Legislative Exchange Council, have evaluated jury eligibility and weighed in with their own recommendations for spreading jury service among the whole population.

This article evaluates the current state of affairs to open jury service to all citizens, and it consists of three sections:

Section I updates and comments on the state and federal tables regarding the analysis of the inclusion/exclusion of potential jurors in the jury pool of state and federal courts. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

"A Jury of Our Peers": Is That Right? the IADC A Jury of Our Peers Committee Reports on Projects around the United States to Improve the Workings of the Civil Jury System
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.