Bogus Federalism

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), June 2, 2004 | Go to article overview

Bogus Federalism


Byline: Bruce Fein, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

President Bush honors federalism more in the breach than in the observance, contrary to his vocal celebration of states' rights as a candidate in the 2000 campaign.

Principles of local choice and experimentation have regularly succumbed to national political expediency, proving that the more things change in the White House, the more they stay the same. Emblematic has been Attorney General John Ashcroft's crusade to void Oregon's Death With Dignity Act (DWDA) under a federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) banner, a coup de main which was defeated last week by the United States Court of Appeals for the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in State of Oregon vs. Ashcroft (May 26, 2004).

The Supreme Court denied a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide in Washington vs. Glucksburg (1997). In a concurring opinion, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor saluted the entrustment of that wrenching issue to the states because both moral and practical knowledge is slender: "States are presently undertaking extensive and serious evaluation of physician-assisted suicide. ... In such circumstances, the ... challenging task of crafting appropriate procedures for safeguarding ... liberty interests is entrusted to the 'laboratory' of states ... in the first instance."

In 1994, the State of Oregon enacted by ballot measure the nation's trailblazing law authorizing physician assisted suicide. The DWDA permits the prescription of lethal doses of controlled substances to terminally ill Oregon residents safeguarded by procedures to protect the vulnerable from coercion or undue influence. For instance, patients must sign a written request for the prescription in the presence of two witnesses attesting to their competence and the lack of duress. In 1997, Oregon voters reaffirmed the DWDA after meticulous debate and scrutiny by opposing a referendum seeking its repeal.

Oregon's pioneering endorsement of physician-assisted suicide has proven unalarming. The annual number of lethal prescriptions has averaged approximately 30, accounting for one-seventh of 1 percent of Oregon deaths.

Moreover, convincing studies have discredited the fretting that the poor, ill-educated, or uninsured would disproportionately resort to assisted suicide.

At present, no sister state jurisdiction has emulated Oregon's example. Some desire more empirical data. Others have been unpersuaded by the moral case for individual choice when inescapable death and parting memories impending. States, however, remain free to alter their physician-assisted suicide policies as citizen education, colloquy, and advocacy dictate. Oregon itself might somersault if the DWDA comes to suggest previously undiscerned or unappreciated moral shortcomings.

Several members of Congress sporting pro-life credentials, including then-Sen. John Ashcroft, Missouri Republican, whined about the DWDA to Attorney General Janet Reno. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Bogus Federalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.