Non-Destructive Provenancing of Bluestone Axe-Heads in Britain

By Williams-Thorpe, Olwen; Potts, P. J. et al. | Antiquity, June 2004 | Go to article overview

Non-Destructive Provenancing of Bluestone Axe-Heads in Britain

Williams-Thorpe, Olwen, Potts, P. J., Jones, M. C., Antiquity

Introduction to non-destructive characterisation of axes

Scientific provenancing of stone axe-heads has become one of the key elements in assessing trade and contact in prehistoric Britain (e.g. Bradley & Edmonds 1993). However, stone axe studies using the traditional method of petrographic thin sectioning (mainly work by the British Implement Petrology Committee; e.g. Clough & Cummins 1988) have suffered both from the necessity of removing a slice or core from the implements, and also from a growing recognition char petrography alone does not always provide an unambiguous answer to questions of provenance (e.g. Fell & Davis 1988; Williams-Thorpe et al 2003).

In order to address these problems, we have adapted and characterised at the Open University several methods of non-destructive analysis for archaeological stone artefacts. The two techniques that are most appropriate for stone axe studies are geochemical analysis using portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF; Williams-Thorpe et al. 1999); and magnetic susceptibility measurements using a hand-held kappameter (Williams-Thorpe et al. 2003). The required equipment is readily portable and therefore analyses can be made in situ at museums or in the field. The facility with which the measurements can be made and, above all, the entirely non-destructive nature of the work, has resulted in a considerable increase in the number of artefacts that are made available to us for study (we estimate an increase of typically around ten-fold over our previous studies that relied on destructive sampling of artefacts). The geochemical and geophysical data that are obtained can be compared with analogous data on potential outcrop sources, and considered in combination with petrographic information derived from hand specimens, and from existing thin sections where these are available.

An important factor in our interpretation of magnetic susceptibility and PXRF data is the use of a number of statistical techniques to support the comparison of artefact and source data. In particular, an atypicality index has been developed to quantify the plausibility of an artefact originating at a particular source (Jones & Williams-Thorpe 2001). This index is especially useful for our application, because it allows robust comparison of data that have different analytical and sampling uncertainties (PXRF data may have larger uncertainties than the source data with which they are compared). While statistics cannot always provide unambiguous answers to questions of provenance, its use in this context introduces an important element of objectivity in assessing, and comparing, artefact outcrop sources.

Notwithstanding the usefulness of these non-destructive methods, it is important to recognise that there are limitations in their application. The surface characteristics of unprepared rock or artefact surfaces--variations in relief and mineralogy, and weathering layers--are of especial importance in PXRF, where most of the analytical signal originates within the 1-2mm or so of material that is nearest to the analyser (magnetic susceptibility is rather less affected by such factors, because the method assesses a greater depth of material, around 20mm).

The presence of weathering layers may cause particular problems, because weathering processes can alter the mineralogical and chemical composition of rocks from the original (bulk rock) composition that is frequently required for provenancing purposes. We are currently investigating ways of quantifying, and compensating for, the analytical effects of weathering in certain rock types (Bernardini et al. in prep.).

The vexed question of whether petrographic or non-destructive (chemical and magnetic) characterisation is more 'successful' for British stone axe provenancing has no easy answer. Both methods rely heavily on the availability of a comparative database for potential sources, so a comparison of robustness of technique is only meaningful for cases where such a database exists for both petrography, and for chemical and magnetic characteristics. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Non-Destructive Provenancing of Bluestone Axe-Heads in Britain


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.