George W. Bush Is Persona Non Grata: Americans Abroad
Carlsen, Laura, Foreign Policy in Focus
February 20, 2004
Much of the world sees President George W. Bush as a persona non grata. Unilateral actions, false intelligence on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and scandals from Halliburton to the president's National Guard service are giving America and its president a bad name. A raft of offensive statements by top diplomats have left the president with a major international image problem.
President Bush's latest boast--"I'm a war president"--was apparently meant to demonstrate his guts in an election year. But for many nations, his statement constituted an outright threat. In the aftermath of the Kay report on WMDs (or lack thereon in Iraq, foreign editorials have railed against a strategy of ends justifies the means in bringing about regime changes that respond to U.S. interests.
Given that the United States is not currently involved in a formal war, the president's bellicose language--"I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with war on my mind"--has set other nations, allies and foes alike, on edge. Around the world, the administration's approach to international affairs has governments and their citizens feeling alienated and apprehensive.
In the Americas, Bush policies have lately provoked what must be a record number of diplomatic complaints. Most recently, the trial of a British intelligence officer for leaking a confidential memo has
reopened wounds in Mexico over a scheme in March to tap the phone lines of countries that refused to condone military action in Iraq.
Bush's front man for Latin America and the Caribbean, Roger Noriega, is hardly the diplomat to solve this growing image problem. Noriega, Asst. Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, has ruffled feathers throughout the region. In Mexico, he accused the country of playing "political games" in its relationship with the U.S., drawing an indignant response from the country's Minister of Foreign Affairs.
In Argentina, Noriega publicly criticized the government's domestic policies and advocated that the Kirchner government break ties with Cuba. President Kirchner retorted: "We're through being used as a carpet ... nobody can sit us down and much less challenge us because we are an independent country with dignity."
The Bush administration has suffered a significant loss of leadership already as a result of snubbing its nose at diplomatic relations. Treated as children by clumsy and arrogant U.S. diplomats (Noriega also referred to Mexico's refusal to back the Iraqi invasion as "a misunderstanding of our common interests"), many nations are rebelling with angry rhetoric and contrary policies.
International trade meetings reflect this defiance. The failure of the World Trade Organization talks in Cancun, the implosion of the FTAA in Miami, and the lack of results at the Special Summit of the Americas in Monterrey are evidence of the mounting resistance to U.S.-tailored economic integration. They also reflect a widespread and deepening rejection of the "'our way or the highway" diplomacy of the Bush administration.
All this may not matter too much to Bush and his policy team. The neoconservative advisers charting this path have never put much stock in alliances. In the short view, animosity abroad can be seen as a small price to pay for global hegemony.
The administration's philosophy is that power is never negotiated--it is exercised. Belief in the unassailable power of the U.S. comes coupled with the conviction of the nation's divine mission in global affairs. As President Bush told the country in his State of the Union Address last month: "America acts in this cause with friends and allies at our side, yet we understand our special calling ..."
But what may seem sublime to some, appears ridiculous to many abroad--and dangerously so. As a result we are seeing a resurgence of some of the ugliest stereotypes of American bullying and hubris. …