Preventing Defendants from Mooting Class Actions by Picking off Named Plaintiffs

By Koysza, David Hill | Duke Law Journal, November 2003 | Go to article overview

Preventing Defendants from Mooting Class Actions by Picking off Named Plaintiffs


Koysza, David Hill, Duke Law Journal


   These rules ... shall be construed and administered to secure the
   just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action. (1)

INTRODUCTION

Federal rules are adopted for specific purposes. Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the class action rule, was adopted to enable courts to resolve the similar claims of numerous plaintiffs in a single action. (2) This Note spotlights and criticizes a threat to the function of the class action device. The threat takes the shape of a full offer of judgment, conveyed by class action defendants to named plaintiffs before class certification, intended to force mootness upon plaintiffs and prevent them from employing the class action device. The practice has been labeled by many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, as the "picking off" of named plaintiffs. (3) An already significant and growing number of federal district courts have held that such offers of judgment, if conveyed before the class is certified, and if consisting of the full amount of damages that each named plaintiff could possibly recover in the action, render the named plaintiffs' claims moot, requiring dismissal of the entire class action. (4) Because these decisions have not required that named plaintiffs actually accept the full offer of judgment--according to many courts, the mere fact that a full offer was made available is sufficient to moot the action--defendants are thereby granted the ability to force dismissal of the putative class action, stripping otherwise qualified plaintiffs of the ability to fully employ the class action device. This Note argues that bestowing such a "secret weapon" (5) upon defendants both thwarts the function of the class action device and vitiates the policies behind it.

This argument rests on a fundamental assumption--that class actions are a good thing, useful enough to be worth preserving. To be sure, the class action device has not gone uncriticized. Commentators and courts have bemoaned the disconnect that often arises between class action lawyers and the class members whom they purport to represent. (6) The pages of reputable journals and reporters are filled with descriptions of "litigation-mad, bottom-feeding, money-hungry, professional plaintiffs' lawyers." (7) Jurists so eminent as Henry Friendly and Richard Posner warn that unscrupulous plaintiffs can leverage the class action device to extract "blackmail settlements" from defendants. (8) Newspapers ridicule the frivolous claims (9) and exorbitant attorneys' fees (10) so often associated with class actions.

Yet even the harshest class action critics cannot completely dismiss the social policies facilitated by the class action device. (11) By allowing numerous plaintiffs who meet Rule 23's prerequisites to pool their resources into a single litigation, thereby spreading the costs of litigation among many participants, (12) properly certified class actions "overcome the problem that small recoveries do not provide the incentive for any individual to bring a solo action prosecuting his or her rights." (13) The class action device has been described as "a complex machinery capable of rectifying huge wrongs spread amongst millions of people who, standing alone, would lack both the incentive and the ability to act with such curative effect." (14) Rather than relying on the government as the sole protector of individual rights, citizens who meet the prerequisites of Rule 23 can themselves use class actions to act as "private attorneys general," (15) preventing discrimination and effecting broad social change. As a result, properly certified class actions have become a significant means by which to implement some of the nation's most important civil rights legislation. (16) Simply put by Justice William O. Douglas, the class action is "one of the few legal remedies the small claimant has against those who command the status quo." (17)

This Note does not join the debate over the merits of the class action device. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Preventing Defendants from Mooting Class Actions by Picking off Named Plaintiffs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.