Screening Deal Fails Test, Say Experts

Western Mail (Cardiff, Wales), July 26, 2004 | Go to article overview

Screening Deal Fails Test, Say Experts


Byline: By MADELEINE BRINDLEY Western Mail

A group of senior clinicians have spoken of their unhappiness about the new system adopted in Wales for routine smear tests. The 18 consultant pathologists and senior laboratory managers have signed a letter opposing the decision to use the 'unfamiliar' SurePath liquid-based cytology system.

They claim the system - for performing and reading smear tests - is more 'labour-intensive' than an alternative which was used in Welsh laboratories during a pilot project.

They have also questioned the procurement process, which concluded a week ago.

Dr Dai Lloyd, Plaid Cymru AM for South West Wales, who has highlighted the issue, said the discontent was evidence of a 'schism' between clinicians and administrators in the NHS.

He said, 'We must have a rethink about this because we cannot have so many clinicians unhappy about this decision.

'But this issue also exposes the huge schism between the administrative and clinical arms of health services in Wales - in this case in Cervical Screening Wales.

'We need to have a strategy whereby any schism or perceived schism can be smoothed over.

'We have a decision which a lot of people are unhappy about - we must now focus on how we overcome this for the good of all women in Wales,' he added.

But Cervical Screening Wales has stood by its decision to award the five-year, pounds 600,000-a-year contract to SurePath, saying it is 'confident in the professionalism of our staff in implementing this new technology'.

Four Welsh laboratories were among the first to use liquid-based cytology - a new way of performing smear tests which cuts down on the number of inadequate tests performed and the number of unnecessary repeat smears a woman must have - as part of a pilot project to assess the new technology.

During this trial period the laboratories had been using an alternative liquid-based cytology system called Cytyc.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice) recommended last year that liquid-based cytology should be used for all smear tests performed in England and Wales in the future.

But it did not recommend which system the various cervical screening services in England and Wales - it said there was 'insufficient evidence' to recommend one above another.

In one of the first contracts to be signed since that decision was made, Cervical Screening Wales chose SurePath as its liquid-based cytology system for the whole of Wales, to the dismay of this group of 18 senior laboratory managers and consultant pathologists. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Screening Deal Fails Test, Say Experts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.