The Word on the Arab Street

By Foster, Charles | Contemporary Review, June 2004 | Go to article overview

The Word on the Arab Street

Foster, Charles, Contemporary Review

IT is going to be a hot summer in the Middle East. There is always foment and ferment, fuelled by angry talk in the mosques and the cafes, but this is something different. There are some other important mutterings--the slightly smug 'I told you so' talk from the academic Arabists of the Western world, almost all of whom prophesied catastrophe as the outcome of the US's Iraq adventure. That catastrophe is now magnified after the stories and photographs of abuse of Iraqi prisoners.

The US has achieved a remarkable alchemical feat, making Arab unity out of Arab discord. Nobody has done it for long or over much of the Middle East before. Eighty years ago, T.E. Lawrence's genius was to weld a few Hejaz tribes into a biddable unit, but they were at each other's throats by the time they reached the gates of Damascus. The Baathist dream of Arab unity was an ironic joke within its first decade.

The notion of seething Arab tribalism became one of the axioms of US policy towards the Arab world. There is no possibility of real Arab unity against us, said the conventional wisdom of the State Department, because however much they dislike us, they will always dislike their neighbours more. And even if we are wrong about that, the policy went on, the Arabs are such fickle, childish people, that any pan-Arab feeling will evaporate in days. Islam, said the Department, can be dismissed. Its divisions are even wider and deeper than those in the secular Arab body. It is run by mediaevalists, and mediaevalists will never be able to understand guided missile systems. The religion itself is an artefact of poverty: it can always be drowned in Coca Cola or poisoned with burgers.

A foreign policy built on such crude, patronising stereotypes was bound to fail. And on the way to failing it was bound to conduct itself so shamefully that the gulf between the Arabs and the West (which is unfortunately and unfairly synonymous with the US to most Arabs), was widened.

Although one must be cautious about stereotypes, some things can validly be said about the Arab view of the world. It has always been quixotic, putting a high price on personal honour. It is easily affronted and inflammable. Love and hate are close companions. Hospitality is abundant. Memories are long, and time is elastic: the Crusades are closer than the Second World War. It is steeped in the logic of paradox, so that paradoxes are often seen as necessarily logical, and logic seen as deviously paradoxical. It is fiercely loyal and loyally fierce, but dangerously fickle. Its appetite for conspiracy theory is insatiable, but that is itself a curious symptom of a deep scepticism. About God, it is generally business-like and realistic. The shrug of joyful or resentful resignation is a commoner movement in Islam than a tug on the lanyard which will trigger the dynamite strapped round the chest. Even in the Islam of the most ascetic desert Muslims there is a strand of sensualism: even renunciation is desired because of its immediate or eventual material bounty. And when it comes to political heavens-on-earth, it is cynical and pragmatic.

It is the history and the paradox which the Americans have not understood. Americans are the most logical and literal and tidy-minded of people. They have, as a nation, no mental pigeon-hole for the news report which said that Shi'ites in southern Iraq were chanting, in one breath: 'Death to Saddam: Death to America'. And so it never got filed, and, for the same reason, will not be prevented again. Ignore whole categories, and whole categories come and blow you up. It is now, chronologically, just over one year since the statues of Saddam fell. It is nine hundred and five years since Baldwin's crusaders overwhelmed Jerusalem. The first is forgotten: the second is not. Be simplistic about chronology, and time will swallow you.

To take the backgammon chatter of Cairo's cafes as prophecy is simply stupid. But not to hear it is worse. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Word on the Arab Street


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.