West Virginia Asbestos Mass Trial: Efficient Innovation or Constitutional Violation? Aside from Denying Due Process, the Concept Has Unintended Consequences by Attracting More Cases and Draining Court and Damage Resources

By Legg, Michael J.; Stengel, James L. | Defense Counsel Journal, July 2004 | Go to article overview

West Virginia Asbestos Mass Trial: Efficient Innovation or Constitutional Violation? Aside from Denying Due Process, the Concept Has Unintended Consequences by Attracting More Cases and Draining Court and Damage Resources


Legg, Michael J., Stengel, James L., Defense Counsel Journal


ASBESTOS litigation has spurred innovations in civil procedure as courts and parties have struggled to manage the number of claims pouting into the courts. (1) The West Virginia judiciary attempted to deal with the "elephantine mass of asbestos cases" through the adoption by the state's Supreme Court of Appeals of an innovative trial management procedure, embodied in its Trial Court Rule 26.01, known as TCR 26.01, which led to the "mass trial" concept. (2)

From the perspective of its first application in In re: West Virginia Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation ("Asbestos Mass Trial"), the mass trial was successful in clearing the queue in court, but that search for efficiency was achieved at the cost of fundamental fairness, leading to constitutional violations of due process and federalism. (3)

MASS TRIAL PROCEDURE

In 2001, in State ex rel. Allman v. MacQueen, (4) the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals explained that asbestos cases threatened to cripple the common law system of adjudication because of the volume of cases, as the disposition of all currently pending asbestos cases, if treated in the traditional course of litigation, was expected to require approximately 150 judge years. (5) It concluded that as Congress had not created any legislative solution to the problem, courts were forced "to adopt diverse, innovative, and often non-traditional judicial management techniques to reduce the burden of asbestos litigation that seems to be paralyzing their active dockets." (6)

The court had created TCR 26.01 in 1999 under its supervisory powers, finding conventional consolidations inadequate for dealing with the volume of asbestos cases filed in West Virginia. (7) The mass trial is not a single method of aggregation, but rather a procedure by which alternatives to case-by-case trials can be examined and appropriate trial management plans developed. In furtherance of this goal, TCR 26.01 established and governed the operation of a Mass Litigation Panel (MLP) composed of West Virginia trial court judges.

The MLP was charged with the responsibility to "develop and implement case management and trial methodologies for mass litigation and to fairly and expeditiously dispose of civil litigation which may be referred to it" by the West Virginia chief justice, and to "make recommendations to the chief justice on the transfer of actions from one circuit to another in order to facilitate any case management or trial methodologies developed by the panel."

Mass litigation is defined by TCR 26.01(c) as two or more civil actions pending in one or more circuit courts

(a) involving common questions of law

or fact in mass accidents or single catastrophic events in which a number of people are injured; or (b) involving common questions of law or fact in "personal injury mass torts" allegedly incurred upon numerous claimants in connection with widely available or mass-marketed products and their manufacture, design, use, implantation, ingestion, or exposure; or (c) involving common questions of law or fact in "property damage mass torts" allegedly incurred upon numerous claimants in connection with claims for replacement or repair of allegedly defective products, including those in which claimants seek compensation for the failure of the product to perform as intended with resulting damage to the product itself or other property, with or without personal injury overtones; or (d) involving common questions of law or fact in "economic loss" cases incurred by numerous claimants asserting defect claims similar to those in property damage circumstances which are in the nature of consumer fraud or warranty actions on a grand scale including allegations of the existence of a defect without actual product failure or injury.

The procedure is triggered by the filing of a "Motion to Refer to Mass Litigation Panel" by any party, judge or the state's administrative director of the courts. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

West Virginia Asbestos Mass Trial: Efficient Innovation or Constitutional Violation? Aside from Denying Due Process, the Concept Has Unintended Consequences by Attracting More Cases and Draining Court and Damage Resources
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.