A Second Look at Regulation's Cost

By Kovitch, S. | Regulation, Summer 2004 | Go to article overview

A Second Look at Regulation's Cost


Kovitch, S., Regulation


The Mercatus Reports section of the Spring 2004 issue of Regulation includes a discussion of OMB's draft 2004 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulation. The discussion refers to a Mercatus Center study that "found that in 2000, U.S. manufacturers spent an average of $2.2 million to comply with federal workplace regulations, or an average of $1,700 per employee. Small and medium sized firms (less than 100 workers) bore a greater burden, with costs of $2,500 per employee--68 percent higher than the costs of larger firms with 500 or more employees." (This last sentence misquotes their study, which stated that small-sized firms had costs of $2,500 per employee. The cost per employee for medium-sized firms according to the study was about $1,400 per employee.)

The cost figures cited above are highly questionable, particularly the supposed $2.2 million average cost per manufacturer. The referenced Mercatus study, "Compliance Costs of Federal Workplace Regulations: Survey Results for U.S. Manufacturers," was written by W. Mark Crain and Joseph M. Johnson and released in late 2001. In addition to the per-employee and per-manufacturer estimates, they estimated the manufacturing sector spent $32 billion in 2000 to comply with federal workplace regulations.

Crain and Johnson developed their estimates from a survey of manufacturing firms conducted in 2001 in cooperation with the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). The survey form was mailed to 3,000 NAM members. Only 100 members responded to the survey, for a response rate of about 3 percent. This is an extremely low response rate and calls into question the reliability of the results. The authors acknowledged the possibility of potential biases on the part of respondents and the need for an expanded sample size to follow up on certain issues. However, they did not conduct an analysis of whether the respondents were representative of NAM's membership or, more importantly, representative of all manufacturing firms.

A review of their data demonstrates that the sample is not representative of the manufacturing sector and, as a result, there are substantial inconsistencies in the results. For example, the aggregate cost figure for the manufacturing sector should be the same whether calculated using cost per employee or cost per firm. Crain and Johnson's $32 billion aggregate estimate for all workplace regulations appears to have been generated by multiplying the cost per employee by the number of employees in the manufacturing sector. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Second Look at Regulation's Cost
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.