Playing to Strength: Teaching Public History at the Turn of the 21st-Century

By Miller, Marla R. | American Studies International, June-October 2004 | Go to article overview

Playing to Strength: Teaching Public History at the Turn of the 21st-Century


Miller, Marla R., American Studies International


Historians in the United States are at present deeply engaged in a conversation about the nature and future of graduate education, and the place of public history in it. Over the past several years, sustained institutional energies have been directed toward the review of current conditions in the teaching of public history, and the development of an improved practice that is more consistent and coherent across programs. Several of those efforts have come to fruition in recently-released reports and ongoing studies that assess the key challenges facing the field and suggest specific strategies for improvement. In 2000, the American Historical Association (AHA) directed its Committee on Graduate Education (CGE) to undertake a comprehensive study of current practices in graduate training; their findings and recommendations were published in the December 2003 volume, The Education of Historians for the Twenty-first Century. (2) The AHA CGE followed this study of doctoral programs with an initiative to examine the nature of the master's degree in history, the degree level where most public history education occurs. In 2001, the AHA council also established the Task Force on Public History (TFPH), charged with, among other things, considering "whether degree offerings in higher education institutions--including undergraduate as well as graduate programs--adequately take into account the role public history can and does play in the nation's cultural life and within the profession." The report of the Task Force was delivered before the AHA's annual meeting in January 2004. (3) In these same years, the National Council on Public History (NCPH)--the main professional organization serving public historians broadly defined--has turned its attention to graduate training; the NCPH Committee on Curriculum and Training is currently surveying and assessing a selected group of existing master's degree programs with the goal of developing broad curriculum guidelines for public history programs. Finally, the Organization of American Historians (OAH) dedicated one of the 2004 "State of the Field" sessions ("State of the Field" sessions are a staple element of the OAH's annual meeting, which itself draws almost three thousand historians; these sessions are intended to introduce non-specialists to current trends and practice) to the topic of public history, creating an opportunity for sustained conversation about the state of public history education and the most promising directions for future development. (4)

The impetus behind this present and growing interest in public history from a number of professional quarters can be traced to developments that are both encouraging and troubling. On the one hand, public history programs in the U.S. are reaching a certain state of maturity. The field has clearly reached a collective milestone as a number of programs founded in the 1970s and 1980s have or will achieve landmark anniversaries in the early twenty-first century, including Middle Tennessee State University (which began to offer a concentration in historic preservation as early as 1973), the University of South Carolina and University of California--Santa Barbara (both founded in 1976), Arizona State University (founded in 1980), Loyola University (founded in 1981), Indiana University/ Purdue University Indianapolis (or IUPUI, founded in 1984) and my own institution, the University of Massachusetts-Amherst (founded in 1986). In 2004, the NCPH itself reached its twenty-fifth year. Public history is without doubt gaining real ground as an area of emphasis within traditional degree programs. As Connie Schulz of the University of South Carolina has put it, "Public history is becoming a central element in the professional education of all historians in the departments fortunate enough to have a public history component in their curriculum." (5) Today, more than sixty programs across the United States, largely grounded in history departments, offer students a certificate, master's degree, or, in some cases, a Ph. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Playing to Strength: Teaching Public History at the Turn of the 21st-Century
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.