Accountability, Autonomy, and Academic Freedom in Educator Preparation Programs

By Pullin, Diana | Journal of Teacher Education, September-October 2004 | Go to article overview

Accountability, Autonomy, and Academic Freedom in Educator Preparation Programs


Pullin, Diana, Journal of Teacher Education


Teacher education programs across the country are encountering intense scrutiny. The current high visibility for issues of quality in teacher education programs has provoked a level of public discourse about the field perhaps unprecedented in our history. Although debates over teacher preparation have been controversial and highly politicized (Cochran-Smith & Fries, 2001; Melnick & Pullin, 2000), state and federal policy makers have moved quickly to implement efforts to alter the governance of the teaching profession, redesigning credentialing systems, altering the regulation of teacher preparation programs, and moving to "deregulate" access to the profession by promoting alternate certification. At the same time, consistent with efforts to use standards-based and test-driven systems to promote accountability in elementary and secondary education, recent state and federal requirements impose test-driven systems and new program approval requirements on college and university teacher education programs. And following new congressional mandates, both the federal and state governments are requiring evidence of "scientifically based research" to justify education programs and practices. These new initiatives create a tension between government, seeking to perform its public responsibility through efforts to reform education, and higher education, seeking to improve education while insuring its integrity as a forum for the free pursuit and exchange of knowledge. Many higher education programs and faculty are only in the early stages of understanding and implementing responses to these changes. Among the issues that should now be considered by both government officials and higher education institutions and their faculty are those concerning the long-standing traditions of autonomy and academic freedom that have been one of the great strengths of the nation's system of higher education.

This article addresses the potential consequences of the new external accountability forces on higher education institutions and their faculties. Although there are currently no court decisions concerning these contemporary issues in teacher education, the article reviews analogous issues of autonomy, academic freedom, and accountability in other higher education contexts. It suggests the types of legal protections that institutions and faculty involved in teacher education programs might have when challenging or resisting external mandates.

The U.S. Secretary of Education recently declared (U.S. Department of Education, 2002) that teacher preparation and state certification policies and practices must "change dramatically" (p. 8) to increase standards and align programs with the requirements of the new federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) (2001). According to the secretary's report, "scientific evidence ... raises questions about the value of attendance in schools of education" (p. 8). The report also finds a "lack of rigor of courses offered in many schools of education, ... leaving [future teachers] ill prepared for the challenges and rigors of the classroom" (p. 15). As a result of his critique, the secretary called for increased use of more rigorous teacher tests, for more emphasis on the verbal ability and content knowledge of teachers, and for considerable expansion of alternate routes to certification independent of the "monopoly" currently held by teacher education programs (p. 40). Subsequently, in implementing the teacher quality components of the NCLBA, the secretary has moved aggressively to promote these goals.

States are moving quickly to implement the new NCLBA requirements to maintain their eligibility for the federal financial assistance available under that law, which is the largest federal aid program for elementary and secondary education. Moreover, the impending reauthorizations of the federal special education law (the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) and the federal Higher Education Act create the real possibility of further accountability requirements for teacher education programs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Accountability, Autonomy, and Academic Freedom in Educator Preparation Programs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.