Corps/corpse: The U.S. Military and Homosexuality

By Brouwer, Daniel C. | Western Journal of Communication, Fall 2004 | Go to article overview

Corps/corpse: The U.S. Military and Homosexuality


Brouwer, Daniel C., Western Journal of Communication


I examine testimony of over thirty military witnesses during four days of 1993 congressional hearings addressing the controversy over gays and lesbians serving openly in the United States military. Witnesses dispute two major topics: the "nature" of the military, and the "nature" of homosexuals. These topics parallel dual meanings of "corps" that structure this controversy--corps as a social body and corps as the flesh of physical bodies. More broadly, I argue that the rhetorical strategies of incorporation and disincorporation function as indices of power, for these strategies are unequally available to the disputants and engender disparate rhetorical effects.

**********

IN 1992, U.S. presidential candidate William Jefferson Clinton proposed lifting the ban against gays and lesbians openly serving in the United States military, and during the next several months, he was dialectically enjoined by military representatives, members of Congress, political activists, pundits, and many others. A compromise policy, the notorious "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," emerged, was approved by Congress, and signed by President Clinton in November 1993 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994. Rather than abating political controversy, however, the policy catalyzed bouts of debate over the qualities of the U.S. military and the characteristics of gays and lesbians. Discharged gay and lesbian soldiers have challenged the policy in courts as their numbers increased each year between 1996 and 2001, a trend only recently reversed in 2002 ("Military Discharged," 2003). Furthermore, news reports tell of six student linguists, gay soldiers training as Arabic translators, who were dismissed from the military just months after Bush Administration and military officials' post-September 11 lamentations that there were too few Arabic translators in the military. (1)

Notably, the June 26, 2003, Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. Texas rejecting that state's sodomy law as unconstitutional augurs a "reinvigorated push" (Price, 2003, p. 4) to overturn the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. Lawrence overturned the Supreme Court's 1986 Bowers v. Hardwick decision that upheld the state of Georgia's ban on consensual gay sex. Because "Bowers has been cited by lower federal courts in upholding the military's ban on open homosexuality in the ranks" (Lane, 2003), the Lawrence decision might well function to grant legal warrant to challenge the ban on gays and lesbians in the military. Indeed, less than two weeks after the Lawrence decision, former soldier Loren S. Loomis filed a federal lawsuit challenging the ban, in part on the basis of the Lawrence decision ("Gay Man," 2003). Two other men who engaged in consensual sex with women but were discharged under the "Don't Ask ..." policy have also cited the Lawrence decision in their appeals to be reinstated to the military (Price, p. 4). It remains to be seen how much legal leverage the Lawrence majority's arguments will provide, but according to a former legal official in the Clinton administration, "The military's policy will definitely be harder to defend after this case" (Lane). In sum, a decade after its implementation, the "Don't Ask ..." policy is under renewed consideration on a number of fronts: citizens and scholars alike might expect to witness a resurrection and reappraisal of the arguments that dominated this controversy nearly a decade ago.

The continuing controversy over gays and lesbians in the military demands critical scrutiny of key discourse events in the development of the "Don't Ask ..." policy. The policy stands as the most recent articulation of the proper place of gays and lesbians in relation to the military, and its key discourse events establish a rhetorical framework for the types of evidence, claims, modes of reasoning, and spokespeople considered to be potentially persuasive. Among the many discourse events related to the development of the policy, I examine two series of congressional hearings that occurred over a period of four days in May 1993--"Policy Implications of Lifting the Ban on Homosexuals in the Military" on May 4 and 5, and "Policy Concerning Homosexuality in the Armed Forces" on May 10 and 11. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Corps/corpse: The U.S. Military and Homosexuality
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.