Towards the Measurement of Empowerment: The Evaluation of Community Development

By Craig, Gary | Journal of the Community Development Society, January 2002 | Go to article overview

Towards the Measurement of Empowerment: The Evaluation of Community Development


Craig, Gary, Journal of the Community Development Society


ABSTRACT

Community development is enjoying something of a revival worldwide. At the same time, however, governments are increasingly concerned to evaluate the effectiveness of community development programs. While the literature has grown concerning the evaluation of public spending programs in general, in the recent context of a mixture of a financial squeeze on public expenditure, consumer-led service responses, and a managerialist approach to service provision, much of the language and techniques of these evaluative approaches is inappropriate to community development given its particular emphases on process and participation. The article reviews current debates on evaluation of public services, identifies the elements of most relevance to community development, and suggests a framework for moving towards a model of best practice.

Keywords: evaluation; process; participation; community development; best practice.

**********

INTRODUCTION

 
    "Many programs are searches and explorations rather than specified 
     experiments, the implicit and often explicit outlook of those who 
     promote evaluations. With poverty programs suffering from 
     inadequate funding, absence of key resources like jobs, deep 
     problems, and political reluctance to switch attention from better 
     situated citizens, the probing for an adequate, authentic, useful 
     and feasible purpose is often the central goal. We seek to learn 
     what we might do usefully rather than checking on how well we have 
     traveled the road to a cost-effective performance" (Miller, 1988). 

Evaluation of public service programs has become a matter of growing--if increasingly contested--concern and the literature has correspondingly grown. Many of the reasons for undertaking evaluation result from political or financial pressures; for example to know "what works" or to ensure proper use of public money (Walker 2001), although increasingly growing interest in evaluation is also about the desire to improve practice. As Breitenbach and Erskine (1994) note in the UK context, heightened pressure from government to engage in evaluation has permeated both local government and the third sector: this pressure arises both from the "new managerialism" in the public sector with its emphasis on identifiable (and usually quantifiable) outputs--an approach that has largely survived the change from Conservative to New Labour governments--and from growing emphasis on the right of consumers to receive quality services of defined standards.

The growth of interest in evaluation has spread in the past few years to community development work as well. Community development work itself has received a welcome boost in many countries, not least in the emerging democracies of East and Central Europe, and in many Third World countries (Community Development Journal, 1998), and the goals of participation and empowerment have been supported by major international players such as the World Bank and the IMF. Evaluation of this work, however, raises important issues about the appropriateness of models of evaluation that have commonly been used to assess the effectiveness of public programs. Recent experience from the United States has been helpful in encouraging a shift away from treasury-driven models, but there is a need to devise a model of evaluation that reflects the goals of community development. This article is a modest contribution to that search.

WHY EVALUATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT?

Most community development work in advanced economies is funded directly or indirectly from public taxation (in developing countries programs tend to be funded from a mix of government and overseas aid). It is obviously desirable that those making use of public money to deliver programs targeted at specific population groups, should want to know whether the program was meeting its stated objectives and doing so in a way that was both resource-efficient and acceptable to intended beneficiaries. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Towards the Measurement of Empowerment: The Evaluation of Community Development
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.